The Danger of the Zionist Infiltration of Christianity-JEW is Not a Word
To understand the infiltration of Zionism in
Christianity as it is today, you must first understand the term "Jew"
and what Zionism is. You must also understand how it applies to the Zionist
Christian or a Judeo Christian Movement. God's "Chosen People " of
the Zionist Christian Church of today are not even Jews. In fact there is not
one single Jew in Israel nor is there a Jew anywhere else on the face of the
earth. To understand this fact you must first understand how the word "Jew"
was replaced with a corrupted version of the
original text of the Latin "Iudaes." Please keep in mind this
is not an "anti-semite" report. This is historical fact and can also
be documented in the King James Scriptures.
It is critical to America and to the innocent People of Israel that are
called out as a "Jew" when in fact they are not (and there is an
innocent People there who like us in the Anglo Saxon Nations have no idea who
they are). When in fact (as previously stated) no one in Israel is a Jew.
EXCERPT:
The Etymology of the Word
"Jew"
In his
classic Facts are Facts, Jewish historian, researcher and scholar Benjamin Freedman
writes:
Jesus is referred as a so-called "Jew" for
the first time in the New Testament in the 18th century. Jesus is first
referred to as a so-called "Jew" in the revised 18th century editions
in the English language of the 14th century first translations of the New
Testament into English. The history of the origin of the word
"Jew" in the English language leaves no doubt that the 18th century
"Jew" is the 18th century contracted and corrupted English word for
the 4th century Latin "Iudaeus" found in St. Jerome's Vulgate
Edition. Of that there is no longer doubt.
The
available original manuscripts from the 4th century to the 18th century
accurately trace the origin and give the complete history of the word
"Jew" in the English language. In these manuscripts are to be found
all the many earlier English equivalents extending through the 14 centuries
from the 4th to the 18th century. From the Latin "Iudaeus" to the
English "Jew" these English forms included successively:
"Gyu," "Giu," "Iu," "Iuu,"
"Iuw," "Ieuu," "Ieuy," "Iwe,"
"Iow," "Iewe," "Ieue," "Iue,"
"Ive," "Iew," and then finally the 18th century,
"Jew." The many earlier English equivalents for "Jews"
through the 14 centuries are "Giwis," "Giws,"
"Gyues," "Gywes," "Giwes," "Geus,"
"Iuys," "Iows," "Iouis," "Iews," and
then also finally in the 18th century, "Jews."
With the
rapidly expanding use in England in the 18th century for the first time in
history of the greatly improved printing presses, unlimited quantities of the
New Testament were printed. These revised 18th century editions of the earlier
14th century first translations into the English language were then widely
distributed throughout England and the English speaking world among families
who had never possessed a copy of the New Testament in any language.
In these
18th century editions with revisions the word "Jew" appeared for the
first time in any English translations. The word "Jew" as it was used
in the 18th century editions has since continued in use in all the editions of
the New Testament in the English language. The use of the word "Jew"
was thus stabilized. . .
The best
known 18th century editions of the New Testament in English are the Rheims
(Douai) Edition and the King James Authorized Edition. The Rheims (Douai) translation of the New Testament into English was
first printed in 1582 but the word "Jew" did not appear in it.
The King
James Authorized translation of the New Testament into English was begun in
1604 and first published in 1611. The word
"Jew" did not appear in
it either. The word "Jew" appeared in both these well known editions
in their 18th century revised versions for the first times.
Countless
copies of the revised 18th century editions of the Rheims (Douai) and the King
James translations of the New Testament into English were distributed to the
clergy and the laity throughout the English speaking world. They did not know
the history of the origin of the English word "Jew" nor did they
care. They accepted the English word "Jew" as the only and as the
accepted form of the Latin "Iudaeus" and the Greek
"Ioudaios." How could they be expected to have known otherwise? The
answer is they could not and they did not. It
was a new English word to them.
When the word "Jew" was first introduced
into the English language in the 18th century its one and only implication,
inference and innuendo was "Judean." However during the 18th,
19th and 20th centuries a well-organized and well-financed international
"pressure group" created a so-called "secondary meaning"
for the word "Jew" among the English speaking peoples of the world. This
so-called "secondary meaning" for the word "Jew" bears no
relation whatsoever to the 18th century original connotation of the word
"Jew." It is a misrepresentation...
There is not a person in the whole English-speaking
world today who regards a "Jew" as a "Judean" in the
literal sense of the Word. That was the correct and only meaning of the word in the 18th century . . . (Facts Are Facts, by Benjamin H. Freedman, p.
15-21).
The meaning of the word "Jew" in our Bible
is not the same as the colloquial idiom.
In the
Bible the word "Jew" means a resident of the land of Judaea
regardless of their tribe, race or religion just as an Australian or Englishman
may in fact be a Chinese, Negro or an Eskimo, or perhaps a member of the tribe
of Judah (Judahite). According to the Greek Lexicon in Strong's Exhaustive Concordance:
Jew: Greek word #2453 Ioudaios (ee-oo-dah'-yos);
from #2448 (in the sense of #2455 as a country); Judaean, i.e. belonging to
Jehudah ["Judah" in Hebrew language of Old Testament]: KJV Jew
(-ess), of Judaea.
Greek word #2448 Iouda (ee-oo-dah'); of Hebrew
origin [Hebrew word #3063 or perhaps #3194]; Judah (i.e. Jehudah or Juttah), a
part of (or place in) Palestine: KJV Judah.
Greek word #2455 Ioudas (ee-oo-das'); of Hebrew
origin [Hebrew #3063]; Judas (i.e. Jehudah), the name of ten Israelites; also
of the posterity of one of them and its region: KJV Juda (-h, -s); Jude.
The Danger Of The Zionist Infiltration of
Christianity-Who and What is Israel
THE PEOPLE OF ISRAEL-WHO IS ISRAEL?
This will surprise
many to learn that there are three Israel's.
Unfortunately the People are only educated to know of one and that is
the Nation of Israel of 1948 which has nothing to do with "Gods Chosen
People." That is a Historical fact and that is a Biblical Truth.
- Israel: A nation founded and recognized in 1948
- Israel: An ancient Kingdom of the Hebrew/Israelite tribes at the southeastern end of the Mediterranean Sea; founded by Saul around 1025 BC and destroyed by the Assyrians in 721 BC
- Israel: Jacob's name was changed to Israel and so it is that Jacob/Israel is a bloodline that is a Historical fact and that is a Biblical Truth
- HISTORY OF ISRAEL THE NATION OF 1948
Source: Harry S. Truman Presidential Library &
Museum
The United States and the Recognition of Israel: A
Chronology
May 17, 1939: British White Paper on Palestine
May 25, 1939: Senator Harry S. Truman inserts
in the Congressional Record strong criticism of the British White Paper on
Palestine, saying it is a dishonorable repudiation by Britain of her
obligations. (This British White
Paper strictly limited the number of "Jews" that could immigrate to
Palestine.)
August 24, 1945: Loy Henderson, director of the
State Department's Near East Agency, writes to Secretary of State James Byrnes
that the United States would lose its moral prestige in the Middle East if it
supported Jewish aspirations in Palestine. (The "Jewish" aspirations were to gain control of not
just Palestine but the entire Middle East)
August 24, 1945: The report of the
Intergovernment Committee on Refugees, called the Harrison Report, is presented
to President Truman. The report is very critical of the treatment by Allied
forces of refugees, particularly Jewish refugees, in Germany. (The Harrison report was a report on
the conditions of the Displaced Persons in Europe and in particular the
"Jews")
August 31, 1945: President Truman writes
British Prime Minister Clement Attlee, citing the Harrison Report and urging
Attlee to allow a reasonable number of Europe's Jews to emigrate to Palestine.
October 22, 1945: Senators Robert Wagner of New
York and Robert Taft of Ohio introduce a resolution expressing support for a
Jewish state in Palestine.
November 13, 1945: The British government
announces the formation of an Anglo-American
Committee of Inquiry to investigate Britain's handling of the Palestine
situation. The committee begins work on January 4, 1946.
(Following WWII, an Anglo-American Committee of
Inquiry was sent to Palestine to study conditions there and report to the UNO
regarding the nature of a desirable settlement. The Committee was a British attempt to deflect US pressure for action to
admit refugees into Palestine.)
From
<http://www.mideastweb.org/angloamerican.htm>
(In 1917 the British Government issued the Balfour
Declaration, stating that it viewed with favor the establishment in Palestine
of a national home for the Jewish people and would endeavor to facilitate the
achievement of this object, although nothing should be done which might
prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in
Palestine. The French and Italian Governments endorsed the Declaration in 1918,
and a Joint Resolution of Congress in 1922 gave formal United States sanction
to the ideal of the Jewish national home. This "National Home" was
new to international law and subject to varied interpretations. It appears
certain that no one in 1917 contemplated the immediate creation of a Jewish
State to rule over the large Arab majority in Palestine. But many responsible
persons in the British and United States Governments and among the Jewsh people
believed that a considerable Jewish majority might develop in Palestine in the
course of time, and that a Jewish State might thus be the ultimate outcome of
the Balfour Declaration.)
November 29, 1945: At a press conference,
President Truman expresses opposition to the Taft-Wagner resolution. He says he
wants to await and consider the report of the Anglo-American Committee of
Inquiry.
(The resolution calls for unlimited Jewish immigration
and settlement in Palestine and the establishment there by Jews of a
“democratic commonwealth.”)
From
<https://www.jta.org/1945/11/30/archive/truman-withdraws-his-support-from-wagner-taft-resolution-on-jewish-commonwealth>
April 20, 1946: The Anglo-American Committee of
Inquiry submits its report, which recommends that Britain immediately authorize
the admission of 100,000 Jews into Palestine. (This was the "Jewish Army of 100,000 Jewish men armed by
the United States discussed in 1942) https://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/study_collections/israel/large/documents/index.php?documentid=1-22&pagenumber=6 )
May 8, 1946: President Truman writes to Prime
Minister Attlee, citing the report of the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry,
and expressing the hope that Britain would begin lifting the barriers to Jewish
immigration to Palestine.
June 21, 1946: A
Joint Chiefs of Staff memorandum to the State-War-Navy Coordinating
Committee warns that if the United States uses armed force to support the
implementation of the recommendations of the report of the Anglo-American
Committee of Inquiry, the Soviet Union might be able to increase its power and
influence in the Middle East, and United States access to Middle East oil could
be jeopardized. (writings in the
link date back to 1942 and confirm that at the time there were well over one
million people in the ME and Palestine already and that a committee had been
formed to send a 100,000 armed "Jewish" army into the ME to Palestine
via the Suez Canal)
September 24, 1946: Counsel to the President
Clark Clifford writes to the President to warn that the Soviet Union wishes to
achieve complete economic, military and political domination in the Middle
East. Toward this end, Clifford argues, they will encourage the emigration of
Jews from Europe into Palestine and at the same time denounce British and
American policies toward Palestine and inflame the Arabs against these
policies. (The United States in
1942 wanted to create a "Jewish " Nation as a "back door to
Russia)
October 4, 1946: On the eve of Yom Kippur,
President Truman issues a statement indicating United States support for the
creation of a "viable Jewish state."
October 23, 1946: Loy Henderson, director of
the State Department's Near East Agency, warns that the immigration of Jewish Communists into Palestine will increase Soviet
influence there. (Zionism
is Marxism Communism )
October 28, 1946: President Truman writes to
King Saud of Saudi Arabia, informing the king that he believes "that a
national home for the Jewish people should be established in Palestine."
1947-48: The White House receives 48,600
telegrams, 790,575 cards, and 81,200 other pieces of mail on the subject of
Palestine.
February 7, 1947: The British government
announces that it will terminate its mandate for Palestine.
February 14, 1947: The British government
announces that it will refer the problem of the future of Palestine to the
United Nations.
April 2, 1947: The British Government submits
to the General Assembly of the United Nations an account of its administration
of Palestine under the League of Nations mandate, and asks the General Assembly
to make recommendations regarding the future government of Palestine.
May 13, 1947: The United Nations General
Assembly appoints an eleven nation Special Committee on Palestine to study the
Palestine problem and report by September 1947.
August 31, 1947: The
United Nations Special Committee on Palestine issues its report, which
recommends unanimously (all 11 member states voting in favor) that Great
Britain terminate their mandate for Palestine and grant it independence at the
earliest possible date; and which also recommends by majority vote (7 of the
member nations voting in favor) that Palestine be partitioned into Jewish and
Arab states.
September 17, 1947: Secretary of State George
Marshall, in an address to the United Nations, indicates that the United States
is reluctant to endorse the partition of Palestine.
September 22, 1947: Loy Henderson, director the State Department's Near East Agency,
addresses a memorandum to Secretary of State George Marshall in which he argues
against United States' advocacy of the United Nations proposal to partition
Palestine. (Loy Henderson
was concerned about "Jewish" Communism)
October 10, 1947: The Joint Chiefs of Staff
argue in a memorandum entitled "The Problem of Palestine" that the
partition of Palestine into Jewish and Arab states would enable the Soviet
Union to replace the United States and Great Britain in the region and would
endanger United States access to Middle East oil.
October 11, 1947: Herschel Johnson, United
States deputy representative on the United Nations Security Council, announces
United States support for the partition plan of the United Nations Special
Committee on Palestine.
October 17, 1947:
President Truman writes to Senator Claude Pepper: "I received about 35,000
pieces of mail and propaganda from the Jews in this country while this matter
[the issue of the partition of Palestine, which was being considered by the
United Nations Special Committee on Palestine from May 13, 1947 to August 31,
1947] was pending. I put it all in a pile and struck a match to it -- I never
looked at a single one of the letters because I felt the United Nations
Committee [United Nations Special Committee on Palestine] was acting in a
judicial capacity and should not be interfered with." (President Truman refuses to address the concerns of the
"Jewish People living in America)
Ca. November 1947: A subcommittee of the United
Nations Special Committee on Palestine establishes a timetable for British
withdrawal from Palestine.
November 19, 1947: Chaim Weizmann meets with
President Truman and argues that the Negev region has great importance to the
future Jewish state.
November 24, 1947: Secretary of State George
Marshall writes to Under Secretary of State Robert Lovett to inform him that
British Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin had told him that British intelligence indicated that Jewish groups
moving illegally from the Balkan states to Palestine included many Communists. (Zionism is Communism)
November 29, 1947: The United Nations General
Assembly approves the partition
plan for Palestine put forward by the United Nations Special Committee on
Palestine. The 1947 UN Partition divided the
area into three entities: a Jewish state, an Arab state, and an international
zone around Jerusalem.
December 2, 1947: President Truman writes to
former Secretary of the Treasury Henry Morgenthau, Jr., encouraging him to tell
his Jewish friends that it is time for restraint and caution. "The vote in
the U.N.," Truman wrote, "is only the beginning and the Jews must now
display tolerance and consideration for the other people in Palestine with whom
they will necessarily have to be neighbors."
December 5, 1947: Secretary of State George
Marshall announces that the State Department is imposing an embargo on all
shipments of arms to the Middle East.
December 12, 1947: President Truman writes to Chaim Weizmann, president of the Jewish Agency
for Palestine and the World Zionist Organization, that it is essential
that restraint and tolerance be exercised by all parties if a peaceful
settlement is to be reached in the Middle East.
February 4, 1948: Chaim Wiezmann, president of
the Jewish Agency for Palestine and the World Zionist Organization, arrives in
New York.
(The World Zionist Organization is a global
organization with the support of the Keren Kayemet Le'Israel, Keren Hayesod and the Government of
Israel.)
February 12, 1948: Secretary of Defense James Forrestal says at a meeting of the National
Security Council that any serious attempt to implement partition in Palestine
would set in motion events that would result in at least a partial mobilization
of United States armed forces.
February 19, 1948: Secretary of State George
Marshall says at a press conference, when asked if the United States would
continue to support partition, that the "whole Palestine thing," was
under "constant consideration."
February 21, 1948: Eddie Jacobson, a longtime and close personal friend of President Truman, sends a
telegram to Truman, asking him to meet with Chaim Weizmann, the president of
the Jewish Agency for Palestine and the World Zionist Organization.
February 22, 1948: President Truman instructs
Secretary of State George Marshall that while he approves in principle a draft
prepared by the State Department of a position paper which mentions as a
possible contingency a United Nations trusteeship for Palestine, he does not
want anything presented to the United Nations Security Council that could be
interpreted as a change from the position in favor of partition that the United
States announced in the General Assembly on November 29, 1947. He further
instructs Marshall to send him for review the final draft of the remarks that
Warren Austin, the United States representative to the United Nations, is to
give before the Security Council on March 19, 1948.
February 27, 1948: President Truman writes to his friend Eddie Jacobson, refusing to meet with
Chaim Weizmann, the president of the Jewish Agency for Palestine and the World
Zionist Organization. (In
the Letters that are archived in the Truman Library Truman was bitter because
he had been treated contemptuously by many of the "Jews" that held
powerful positions at that time)
March 8, 1948: Counsel to the President Clark
Clifford writes to President Truman, in a memorandum entitled "United
States Policy with Regard to Palestine," that Truman's actions in support
of partition are "in complete conformity with the settled policy of the
United States."
March 9, 1948: Secretary of State George
Marshall instructs Warren Austin, United States representative to the United
Nations, that if a United Nations special assembly on Palestine were convened,
the United States would support a United Nations trusteeship for Palestine.
March 12, 1948: The
United Nations Special Committee on Palestine reports that "present
indications point to the inescapable conclusion that when the [British] mandate
is terminated, Palestine is likely to suffer severely from administrative chaos
and widespread strife and bloodshed." (This continues to this very day in
the Nation of Palestine.)
March 13, 1948: President Truman's friend Eddie
Jacobson walks into the White House without an appointment and pleads with
Truman to meet with Chaim Weizmann, the president of the Jewish Agency for Palestine and the World Zionist Organization. Truman
responds: "You win, you baldheaded son-of-a-bitch. I will see him."
March 18, 1948:
President Truman meets with Chaim Weizmann, the president of the Jewish Agency
for Palestine and the World Zionist Organization. Truman says he wishes
to see justice done in Palestine without bloodshed, and that if the Jewish
state were declared and the United Nations remained stalled in its attempt to
establish a temporary trusteeship over Palestine, the United States would recognize
the new state immediately.
March 18, 1948: The
United Nations Special Commission on Palestine reports to the United Nations
Security Council that it has failed to arrange any compromise between Jews and
Arabs, and it recommends that the United Nations undertake a temporary
trusteeship for Palestine in order to restore peace.
March 19, 1948:
United States representative to the United Nations Warren Austin announces to
the United Nations Security Council that the United States position is that the
partition of Palestine is no longer a viable option.
March 20, 1948: Secretary of State George
Marshall announces that the United States will seek to work within the United
Nations to bring a peaceful settlement to Palestine, and that the proposal for
a temporary United Nations trusteeship for Palestine is the only idea presently
being considered that will allow the United Nations to address the difficult
situation in Palestine.
March 21, 1948: President Truman writes in his
diary regarding the confusion caused by the State Department's handling of the
trusteeship issue: "I spend the day trying to right what has happened. No
luck. Marshall makes a statement. Doesn't help a bit."
March 21, 1948: President Truman writes to his
sister Mary Jane Truman that the "striped pants conspirators" in the
State Department had "completely balled up the Palestine situation."
But, he writes, "it may work out anyway in spite of them."
March 22, 1948: President Truman writes to his
brother Vivian Truman regarding Palestine: "I think the proper thing to
do, and the thing I have been doing, is to do what I think is right and let
them all go to hell."
March 25, 1948: President Truman says at a press
conference that a United Nations trusteeship for Palestine would be only a
temporary measure, intended to establish the peaceful conditions that would be
the essential foundation for a final political settlement. He says that
trusteeship is not a substitute for partition.
April 11, 1948:
President Truman's friend Eddie Jacobson enters the White House unnoticed by
the East Gate and meets with Truman. Jacobson recorded of this meeting:
"He reaffirmed, very strongly, the promises he had made to Dr. Weizmann
and to me; and he gave me permission to tell Dr. Weizmann so, which I did. It
was at this meeting that I also discussed with the President the vital matter
of recognizing the new state, and to this he agreed with a whole heart."
May 12, 1948: President
Truman meets in the Oval Office with Secretary of State George Marshall, Under
Secretary of State Robert Lovett, Counsel to the President Clark Clifford and
several others to discuss the Palestine situation. Clifford argues in favor of
recognizing the new Jewish state in accordance with the United Nations
resolution of November 29, 1947.
(What resulted was Resolution 181 [known also as the
1947 Partition Plan], a nonbinding recommendation to partition Palestine, whose
implementation hinged on acceptance by both parties – Arabs and Jews. The
resolution was adopted on November 29, 1947 in the General Assembly by a vote
of 33-12, with 10 abstentions. Among the supporters were the United States and
the Soviet Union, as well as other nations including France and Australia. The
Arab nations, including Egypt, Syria, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia denounced the plan
on the General Assembly floor and voted as a bloc against Resolution 181
promising to defy its implementation by force.
The resolution recognized the need for immediate
Jewish statehood.)
UN
partition plan for Palestine adopted in 1947.
Marshall opposes
Clifford's arguments, and contends they are based on domestic political
considerations. He says that if Truman follows Clifford's advice and recognizes
the Jewish state, then he (Marshall) would vote against Truman in the election.
Truman does not clearly state his views in the meeting.
May 12, 13, and 14, 1948: Counsel to the
President Clark Clifford and Under Secretary of State Robert Lovett discuss the
different views held in the White House and the State Department regarding
whether the United States should recognize the Jewish state. Lovett reports to
Clifford on May 14 that Marshall will neither support nor oppose Truman's plan
to recognize the Jewish state, that he will stay out of the entire matter.
May 13, 1948: Chaim
Weizmann, president of the Jewish Agency for
Palestine and the World Zionist Organization, writes to President Truman:
"I deeply hope that the United States, which under your leadership has
done so much to find a just solution [to the Palestine situation], will
promptly recognize the Provisional Government of the new Jewish state. The
world, I think, would regard it as especially appropriate that the greatest
living democracy should be the first to welcome the newest into the family of
nations."
May 14, 1948: late morning eastern standard time (late
afternoon in Palestine): David
Ben-Gurion, Israel's first prime minister, reads a "Declaration of
Independence," which proclaims the existence of a Jewish state called Israel beginning on May 15, 1948, at 12:00 midnight
Palestine time (6:00 p.m., May 14, 1948,eastern standard time).
May 14, 1948, 6 p.m. eastern standard time (12:00
midnight in Palestine): The British
mandate for Palestine expires, and the state of Israel comes into being.
May 14, 1948, 6:11 p.m. eastern standard time:
The United States recognizes
Israel on a de facto basis. The White House issues the following statement:
"This Government has been informed that a Jewish state has been proclaimed
in Palestine, and recognition has been requested by the provisional government
thereof. The United States recognizes the
provisional government as the de facto authority of the State of Israel." To see a color copy of this document click here.
May 14, 1948, shortly after 6:11 p.m. eastern standard
time: United States representative to the
United Nations Warren Austin leaves his office at the United Nations and goes
home. Secretary of State Marshall sends a State Department official to the
United Nations to prevent the entire United States delegation from resigning.
May 15, 1948: On
May 15, 1948, the Arab states issued their response statement and Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon and Iraq attack Israel.
January 25, 1949: A permanent government takes
office in Israel following popular elections.
January 31, 1949: The United States recognizes
Israel on a de jure basis.
February 24 to July 20, 1949: Israel signs armistice
agreements with Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan and Syria.
As the Historical Fact noted above in the Chronology
of the creation of Israel and the Partition of Palestine it becomes quite clear
that Modern Day Israel is not the Ancient Homeland of the Ancient Israelite
Nation. It is in fact a creation of the UNITED NATIONS as well as the United
States and Britain that also aided in the creation of Modern Day Israel in
1948.
ZIONISM AND THE NATION OF ISRAEL
Zionism is presented
to the Nations as a religious and
political effort that brought thousands of "Jews" from around the
world back to their ancient homeland in the Middle East and reestablished
Israel as the central location for Jewish identity. While some critics call
Zionism an aggressive and discriminatory ideology, the Zionist movement has
successfully established a Jewish homeland in the nation of Israel. ( This sounds innocuous but is quite
dangerous and is what is known today as
the New World Order which is a Political and Religious World Order which is
what Zionism also Marxism, Communism,
Bolshevism and this Ideology is based on the Babylonian Talmud and is the
Rabbinical Law of Modern Day Israel )
("The Jewish people as a whole will become its
own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races,
by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and by the
establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise
the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the "children of
Israel" will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The
Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without
difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish
rulers to abolish private property and everywhere to make use of the resources
of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is
said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property
of the whole world in their hands."
--Baruch Levy, Letter to Karl Marx, 'La Revue de
Paris', p.574, June 1, 1928 )
- Israel: An ancient Kingdom of the Hebrew/Israelite tribes at the southeastern end of the Mediterranean Sea; founded by Saul around 1025 BC and destroyed by the Assyrians in 721 BC
Saul (/sɔːl/; Hebrew: שָׁאוּל, Modern Ša’ul, Tiberian Šā’ul, meaning "asked for, prayed for"; Latin: Saul; Arabic: طالوت, Ṭālūt or شاؤل, Ša'ūl),
according to the Hebrew Bible, was the first king of the Kingdom of Israel and Judah. His reign, traditionally placed in the
late 11th century BCE,[1] marked a transition from a tribal
society to statehood.[2]
According to the Tanakh, (The Old Testament of the Holy Scriptures) Saul was the son of Kish, of the family of the
Matrites, and a member of the tribe of Benjamin,
one of the twelve Tribes
of Israel. It appears that he came from Gibeah.[3]
Matri, Matrites
MATRI, MATRITES mă’ trī, mă’ trīts (מַטְרִ֑י). Matri
was a family of the tribe of Benjamin to which Saul belonged. When Israel chose
its first king, the lot fell upon the tribe of Matri (1 Sam 10:21).
KJV has MATRI; RSV, ASV, MATRITES.
The United Monarchy
(Hebrew: המלוכה המאוחדת) is the name given to the Israelite[note 1] kingdom of Israel and Judah,[2][3][4] during the reigns of Saul, David and Solomon, as
depicted in the Hebrew Bible. This is traditionally dated between
1050 BCE and 930 BCE. On the succession of Solomon's son, Rehoboam,
around 930 BCE, the biblical account reports that the country split into two
kingdoms: the Kingdom of Israel (including the cities of Shechem and Samaria) in the north and the Kingdom of Judah (containing Jerusalem) in the south.
- ANCIENT ISRAEL-JACOB IS ISRAEL-ISRAEL IS A BLOODLINE THE PEOPLE OF ISRAEL ARE ISRAELITES
Ya‘aqōv (help·info), Tiberian Yā‘āqōḇ), later given the name Israel, is regarded as a Patriarch of the Israelites
Jacob's twelve
sons, named in Genesis,
were Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Dan, Naphtali, Gad, Asher, Issachar, Zebulun, Joseph, and Benjamin.
According to the Book of Genesis, Jacob
was the third Hebrew progenitor with whom God made a covenant. He is
the son of Isaac and Rebecca, the grandson of Abraham, Sarah and Bethuel, the nephew of Ishmael, and the younger twin
brother of Esau. Jacob had
twelve sons and at least one daughter, by his two wives, Leah and Rachel, and by their handmaidens Bilhah and Zilpah.
Genesis 32:28
“And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob,
but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast
prevailed.”
THE HALF TRIBES
He was Rachel's firstborn and Jacob's eleventh son
According to the Hebrew Bible, the Tribe of Ephraim
(Hebrew: אֶפְרַיִם / אֶפְרָיִם,
Modern Efrayim, Tiberian ʾEp̄ráyim
/ ʾEp̄rā́yim) was one of the Tribes of Israel. The Tribe of Manasseh together with Ephraim also formed the House of Joseph.
After
the destruction of the Israelite kingdoms of Samaria and Judah in 720 and 586 BCE
respectively the
concepts of Jew and Samaritan gradually replaced Judahite and Israelite
The destruction of the Kingdom of Israel
Assyria’s conquest of
the northern kingdom of Israel began approximately 740 BC under King Pul. First Chronicles 5:26
notes, “So the God of Israel stirred up the spirit of Pul king of Assyria, the
spirit of Tiglath-pileser king of Assyria, and he took them into exile, namely,
the Reubenites, the Gadites, and the half-tribe of Manasseh, and brought them
to Halah, Habor, Hara, and the river Gozan, to this day.” These tribes, located
east of the Jordan River, were the first ones conquered by Assyria.
Assyrians The People of the Empire of Sargon the
Magnificent
It was the Assyrian
monarch, Sargon II (721-705 BC), who first forcefully relocated Hebrews after
the conquest of Israel, the northern kingdom of the Hebrews. Although this was
a comparatively mild deportation and perfectly in line with Assyrian practice,
it marks the historical beginning of the Jewish ( ISRAELITES ) diaspora. This chapter in the Jewish (
ISRAELITES ) diaspora, however, never has been really written, for the
Hebrews deported from Israel seem to have blended in with Assyrian society and,
by the time Nebuchadnezzar II conquers Judah (587 BC), the southern kingdom of
the Hebrews, the Israelites deported by
Sargon II have disappeared nameless and faceless into the sands of northern
Mesopotamia.
The Danger Of The Zionist Infiltration of
Christianity-A Lost and Stolen Identity
YOU WILL NOTICE THAT "JEWISH" WRITINGS GO
BACK AND FORTH BETWEEN JEWS ( ASHKENAZIC PEOPLE ) AND ISRAELITES BECAUSE THEY
ARE AND ALWAYS HAVE BEEN TWO DISTINCT PEOPLES
PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT JEWISH THE
WORD IS A MISNOMER THAT APPEARED IN THE 18TH CENTURY SO I WILL NOT BE USING THE
WORD EXCEPT WHEN IT IS USED EITHER IN IGNORANCE OR FOR DECEPTION AND CONFUSION
misnomer (mĭs-nōˈmər)
An error in naming a person or place.
Application of a wrong name.
A name wrongly or unsuitably applied to a person or an
object.
THE PEOPLE OF MODERN DAY ISRAEL
Today in Modern Day Israel of 1948 there are four
types of People that make up the majority of the Jewish population.
- Ashkenazic-The Majority Population of Modern Day Israel
- Sephardim
- Oriental THE MINORITY POPULATION
4. Ethiopian
ASHEKENAZIC PEOPLE: Is
It a Culture or Ethnic Group?
Most secular
American Jews think of their Jewishness as a matter of culture or ethnicity.
When they think of Jewish culture, they think of the food, of the Yiddish language, of some
limited holiday
observances, and of cultural values like the emphasis on education.
Those secular American Jews would probably be
surprised to learn that much of what they think of as Jewish culture is really
just Ashkenazic
Jewish culture, the culture of Jews whose ancestors come from one part
of the world.
History of the Ashekenazic People of Modern Day Israel
DNA research science
from Dr. Eran Elhaik (a Jew) and associates at the McKusick-Nathans Institute
of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, have
confirmed that, “97% of the 17 million of the world’s Jews ARE NOT descendants
of Abraham.” ( These people are
the Ashkenazic people they are the descendants of Cain )
In 2001, genetics
research by Dr. Ariella Oppenheim of Hebrew University in Tel Aviv, produced
basically the same results as Dr. Elhaik. Oppenheim’s study also found that the
Jews ( Ashekenazic people a Khazarian ) origins
are in Khazaria, and that they are of Turkic bloodline. She also
reported that some Palestinians have the chromosome in their blood indicating
they are Cohanim and Israelite.
The Khazars were not “Semites”. They were an Asiatic
Mongoloid nation. They are classified by modern anthropologists as Turco-Finns
racially. From time immemorial the homeland of the Khazars was
in the heart of Asia. They were a very warlike nation. The Khazars were
driven out of Asia finally by the nations in Asia with whom they were
continually at war. The Khazars invaded eastern Europe to escape further
defeats in Asia. The very warlike Khazars did not find it difficult to
subdue and conquer the 25 peaceful agricultural nations occupying approximately
1,000,000 square miles in eastern Europe. In a comparatively short period the
Khazars established the largest and most powerful kingdom in Europe, and
probably the wealthiest also.
The
Khazars were a pagan nation when they invaded eastern Europe. Their
religious worship was a mixture of phallic worship and other forms of
idolatrous worship practiced in Asia by pagan nations This form of worship
continued until the 7th century. The vile forms of sexual excess indulged in by
the Khazars as their form of religious worship produced a degree of moral
degeneracy the Khazar’s king could not endure. In
the 7th century King Bulan, ruler at that time of the Khazar Kingdom, decided
to abolish the practice of phallic worship and other forms of idolatrous
worship and make one of the three monotheistic religions, about which he
knew very little, the new state religion. After a historic session with
representatives of the three monotheistic religions King Bulan decided against Christian and Islam and selected as the
future state religion as the religious worship then know as “Talmudism”, and
now known and practiced as “Judaism”. This even is well documented in
history.
Dr. Elhaik and the
prestigious Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine conclude in their
report: “The Khazarian
Hypothesis suggests that Eastern European Jews descended from the Khazars, an
amalgam of Turkic clans that settled the Caucasus in the early centuries CE and
Converted to Judaism in the eighth century…Following the collapse of their
empire, the Judeo-Khazars fled to Eastern Europe. The rise of European Jewry is
therefore explained by the contribution of the Judeo-Khazars.”
“Strictly
speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a
contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew.”
(1980
Jewish Almanac, p. 3)
The Jewish Encyclopedia:
“Khazars,
a non-Semitic, Asiatic, Mongolian tribal nation who emigrated into Eastern
Europe about the first century, who were converted as an entire nation to
Judaism in the seventh century by the expanding Russian nation which absorbed
the entire Khazar population, and who account for the presence in Eastern
Europe of the great numbers of Yiddish-speaking Jews in Russia, Poland,
Lithuania, Galatia, Besserabia and Rumania.”
.
The American Peoples Encyclopedia
… for
1954 at 15-292 records the following in reference to the Khazars: “In the year
740 A.D. the Khazars were officially converted to Judaism. A century later they
were crushed by the incoming Slavic-speaking people and were scattered over
central Europe where they were known as Jews.
–
According to the standard Jewish Encyclopedia 96% of
all the Jews known to the world today are descendents of the Khazar tribes of
Russia, Eastern Europe and western Mongolia
Academic American Encyclopedia (1985):
“Ashkenazim, the Ashkenazim are one of the two major divisions of the Jews, the other being the Shephardim.”
“Ashkenazim, the Ashkenazim are one of the two major divisions of the Jews, the other being the Shephardim.”
The Jewish Encyclopedia:
“Khazars, a non-Semitic, Asiatic, Mongolian tribal
nation who emigrated into Eastern Europe about the first century, who were
converted as an entire nation to Judaism in the seventh century by the
expanding Russian nation which absorbed the entire Khazar population, and who
account for the presence in Eastern Europe of the great numbers of
Yiddish-speaking Jews in Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Galatia, Besserabia and
Rumania.
The American Peoples Encyclopedia for 1954 at 15-292
records the following in reference to the Khazars:
“In the year 740 A.D. the Khazars were officially
converted to Judaism. A century later they were crushed by the incoming
Slavic-speaking people and were scattered over central Europe where they were
known as Jews.
" it is clear
that the genomes of individuals with full Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry carry an unambiguous signature of their Jewish heritage,
and this seems more likely to be due to their specific Middle Eastern ancestry
than to inbreeding."
( The Ashkenazic People are the only "Jews"
that carry this anomaly.)
SARGON THE MAGNIFICENT AND THE KHAZARIAN EMPIRE
Isaiah 20:1
“In the year that
Tartan came unto Ashdod, (when Sargon the king of Assyria sent him,) and fought
against Ashdod, and took it;”
King James Version
(KJV)
SARGON THE GREAT OF AKKAD AND CAIN
THE FIRST EMPIRE BUILDER OF MESOPOTAMIA
Jason Freewalt
Ancient Warfare - HIST611 A001 Fall 14
Dr. Leda Ciraolo
American Military University
November 2, 2014
EXCERPTS:
Sargon may have been
a usurper. A fragment of a Sumerian text contradicts the Sargon legend by
naming his father, a gardener named La’ibum.6 Akki was a gardener, so
there may be some link between La’ibum
( Genesis 4:2 “And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was
a tiller of the ground.” )
Mrs Sydney ( Ethel
)Bristowe wrote Sargon the Magnificent. According to her theory, people
known as pre-Adamites lived on the earth before Adam and Eve. ( Pre - Adamites Genesis 1:26-29
26And God said, Let us make man in our
image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea,
and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and
over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. 27So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him;
male and female created he them. 28And God blessed them, and God said
unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it:
and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and
over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. 29And God said, Behold, I have given
you every herb bearing seed, which is
upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you
it shall be for meat. )
Genesis
31: And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the
morning were the sixth day. KJV
The
Adamic Race - The 8th Day Creation
Genesis 2:1-3 KJV :
1 Thus
the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.
2 And
on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the
seventh day from all his work which he had made.
3 And
God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had
rested from all his work which God created and made.
Genesis
5-7
5 And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every
herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain
upon the earth, and
there was not a man to till the ground.
6 But
there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.
7 And
the LORD God formed man of the dust of
the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a
living soul.
(
Genesis 4:8 And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when
they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew
him. )
This is the reason
that Cain, who killed his brother Abel, feared he would be killed by “anyone
who finds him” if he had to leave Eden as a punishment for his sin. ( At that point Cain was cursed by God: Genesis 4:11-12
11 And
now art thou cursed from the earth,
which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother's blood from thy hand;
12
When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her
strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth. )
The Sephardim People of Modern Day Israel
Sephardim who came
under the control of Ashkenazi religious authorities, were obliged to send
their children to Ashkenazi religious schools, where they learned the ‘correct’
Ashkenazi forms of practicing Judaism, including Yiddish-accented praying,
liturgical-gestural norms and sartorial codes favoring the dark color of
centuries-ago Poland. Some Oriental Jews, then, were forced into the Orthodox
mold.
At first, the
Sephardi newcomers were so-to-speak ‘religiously invisible.’ As with so much
else in the early days of Israeli statehood, the new Sephardi immigrants were
dependent upon establishment institutions even in matters of religion. The
Ministry of Religious Affairs provided houses of worship, prayer books, and an
official state-salaried rabbinate. The Ministry of Education provided
religiously-oriented public schools. And the religious political parties
offered various forms of patronage. Some of the traditional spiritual leaders
who came to Israel with their communities experienced a loss of their
authority. Young Sephardim who entered the religious youth movements or went on
to higher religious education usually found themselves in an Ashkenazi
environment. Since most of the rabbinical colleges were also European-founded,
new Sephardi rabbis were often trained in the Ashkenazi orthodox fashion with
its different world outlook, its very distinct approach to piety, and even its
own distinctive dress code.
Much has been
written about the Sephardic People and the connection to the Melungeon People
of the Southern States of America. Often the European DNA of those People is
ignored especially the if they are of a pure European Bloodline and instead the
focus is on the Melungeon People of a mixed heritage always they have the
European bloodline that cannot or will not be explained.
These people were
originally called Sephardic Israelites.
LEARN THE PARABLE OF THE FIG TREE - JACOB THE MAN
ISRAEL IS THIS PARABLE
Matthew 24: King James Holy Bible 29Immediately after the tribulation of
those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light,
and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be
shaken: 30And then shall appear the sign of the
Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and
they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and
great glory. 31And he shall send his angels with a
great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the
four winds, from one end of heaven to the other. 32Now learn a parable of the fig tree;
When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh:
33So likewise ye, when ye shall see all
these things, know that it is near, even
at the doors. 34Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all
these things be fulfilled. 35Heaven and earth shall pass away, but
my words shall not pass away.
What is
the parable of the Fig Tree that Christ said for us to learn?
Even the
Ashkenazi people know that this is when the nation Israel began in 1948. Two
figs-two peoples went to the nation Israel. The good figs and the bad figs. We
have established the people of the nation of Israel today. But who, are the
good figs and who are the bad figs?
Fig is
simply something that is hidden. So what is hidden? Tree is genealogy. So, we
have hidden genealogy, of both the good figs and the bad figs. The Children of
Jacob who are the Israelites and the children of Cain who are an imposter
people. The generation that will not pass away is the generation of 1948. Such a simple lesson Christ said to learn. To
know and understand.
The
Sephardic People are the Good Figs and they are Israelites and they did descend
from Jacob who is Israel. It is critical to know the truth about who People
really are. Especially, the People of Jacob who have no idea who they are
because along with the multitudes of their brethren they too have been
scattered. There is deliberate deception involved in keeping the Sons and
Daughters of Jacob ignorant because neither Cain nor his offspring can ever
attain the Blessings of Almighty God. So the genealogy of the Children of Jacob
has been literally hijacked in order to obtain the Blessings of God thru
deception.
This reads : Statutes of the Sephardi Israelite
Benevolent Society.
A deliberate
mistranslation is this:
The Statutes of the
Sephardi Jewish Charitable Society
The Sephardi
Israelites noted the purpose of this Society:
a) To uphold
the preservation of a social club with all the goods that are necessary.
b) [Provide] relief
to all poor Israelites in the event of misfortune or disease, preferably to
members
c) Defray the
expenses for all poor Israelite immigrants during the first eight days
of their presentation to the Society.
d) Assist and help
the orphans and widows of members who die in poverty
Ancient City belonging to the white-skinned 'Cloud
People' Chachapoyas discovered in Peru
The Chachapoyas,
also called the Warriors of the Clouds, were an Andean people living in the
cloud forests of the Amazonian region of present-day Peru.
Chachapoyas
chronicler Pedro Cieza de Leon wrote of the tribe: 'They are the whitest and
most handsome of all the people that I have seen, and their wives were so
beautiful that because of their gentleness, many of them deserved to be the
Incas' wives and to also be taken to the Sun Temple.
'The women and their
husbands always dressed in woollen clothes and in their heads they wear their
llautos [a woollen turban], which are a sign they wear to be known everywhere.'
In Deuteronomy 32
King James Bible we are told that God
would scatter His People into corners. ( that would be the 4 corners of the
earth East, West, North and South ) and that He would make the remembrance of
them to cease from among men.
Deuteronomy 32:23-29 23I will heap mischiefs upon them; I will spend mine
arrows upon them. 24They shall be burnt with hunger, and devoured with burning heat,
and with bitter destruction: I will also send the teeth of beasts upon them,
with the poison of serpents of the dust. 25The sword without, and terror within, shall destroy
both the young man and the virgin, the suckling also with the
man of gray hairs. 26I said, I would scatter
them into corners, I would make the remembrance of them to cease from among
men: 27Were it not that I feared the wrath of the enemy, lest
their adversaries should behave themselves strangely, and lest they should say, Our hand is high, and the LORD
hath not done all this. 28For they are a nation void of
counsel, neither is
there any understanding in them. 29O that they were wise, that they
understood this, that they would consider their latter end!
In the History
Channel documentary, the Judaic origins of the Central Band of Cherokees, an
officially unrecognized group of Native Americans who are possessed of
strikingly European features, are examined both historically and
scientifically. The Central Band are located in Tennessee and seem to have been
for some time. Among their own traditions, this tribe believes they are
partially (if not wholly) descended from ancient Israelites who practiced
Judaism. ( Judaism like Christianity has been
corrupted by the Babylonian Talmud )The Central Band points to many
similarities in their culture to that of those near-eastern people. ( These People are the "mysterious" Blue Eyed
Cherokees )
THE MELUNGEONS
High in the misty
hills of the southern Appalachian Mountains, along the border between Tennessee
and Virginia there can be found a group known as the Melungeons. These people
have a noticeable mélange (from the French, meaning "mix") of features:
reddish-brown skin, straight and fair hair, thin lips, and narrow faces.
Standing out from both the native Americans and the Europeans who people the
region, the Melungeons are thought to be a mix of different ethnicities. Some
feel they represent the descendents of shipwrecked Spanish or Portuguese
explorers who then interbred among natives and perhaps even slaves. Wilder
theories claim them to be descended from the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel. If you
ask them, however, you will likely hear a similar story: the Melungeons are
descended from the survivors of Roanoke colony.
For much of American
history, of course, Mediterranean lineage was a valuable asset to anyone with
an olive complexion, often, in this case, combined with aquiline features and
sometimes blue eyes: it meant the people in question were not black.
The Melungeon DNA Project is a genetic study
started in 2005 by the private company Family Tree DNA of
people with identified Melungeon
ancestors (according to historic records), mostly residing in Hancock County,
Tennessee and nearby areas of Kentucky. The Melungeon
people are a mixed-race group who married within the group up until about 1900.
There was speculation about their identity and ancestry for decades, and many
differing accounts of their origins.
This study was
started in 2005. Researchers published an article in 2012 summarizing their
results. The female ancestors were shown to have had European DNA,
while male ancestors had DNA from African or
European haplogroups.
Only one male had a Native American haplogroup.
Other Melungeon
individuals and families are accepted and identify as white, particularly since
the mid-20th century. They have tended to "marry white" since before
the twentieth century.[8]
A Melungeon Family
DNA Consultants
ABSTRACT: The only
previous attempt to validate the probabilistic prediction of ethnicity by an
autosomal DNA database found a margin of error as large as 20% in identifying
whether random samples were to be classified as "White" or
"African American."
The authors took a
more comprehensive approach based on case studies within a single mixed
population. Using a convenience sample of 40 self-identifying Melungeons (a
tri-racial isolate population in the southern Appalachian Mountains), the
authors analyzed and compared their world database and ENFSI results. Several
test subjects were part of an extended family, so it was possible to judge the
consistency of results both latitudinally and longitudinally.
Among the findings:
"One is left with a pattern of predominantly northeastern Scottish
ancestry supplemented with Mediterranean elements and only minor contributions
from adjacent northwestern European populations (England/Wales, Netherlands,
Norway, Belgium, Denmark)."
The Mediterranean race (also Mediterranid race) is one of the sub-races into
which the Caucasian race
was categorised by most anthropologists
in the late 19th to mid-20th centuries.[1] According to various definitions,
it was said to be prevalent in Southern Europe, parts
of Western Asia,
western Central Asia
and parts of South Asia,
in North Africa and
the Horn of Africa.
To a lesser extent, certain populations of people in parts of Britain, Ireland and Germany, despite living far
from the Mediterranean, were deemed as potentially having some Mediterranean
elements in their population, such as Bavaria, Wales and certain parts of
England.[2][3][4][5][6][7][8] It is characterized by medium or
shorter stature, long (dolichocephalic)
or moderate (mesocephalic)
skull, a narrow and often slightly aquiline nose,
prevalence of dark hair and eyes,[9] and pink to reddish to light or
dark brown skin tone; olive
complexion being especially common.[10]
The Mediterranean race (also Mediterranid race) is one of the sub-races into
which the Caucasian race
was categorised by most anthropologists
in the late 19th to mid-20th centuries.[1] According to various definitions,
it was said to be prevalent in Southern Europe, parts
of Western Asia,
western Central Asia
and parts of South Asia,
in North Africa and
the Horn of Africa.
To a lesser extent, certain populations of people in parts of Britain, Ireland and Germany, despite living far
from the Mediterranean, were deemed as potentially having some Mediterranean
elements in their population, such as Bavaria, Wales and certain parts of
England.[2][3][4][5][6][7][8] It is characterized by medium or
shorter stature, long (dolichocephalic)
or moderate (mesocephalic)
skull, a narrow and often slightly aquiline nose,
prevalence of dark hair and eyes,[9] and pink to reddish to light or
dark brown skin tone; olive
complexion being especially common.[10]
An Italian man of
Mediterranean type, from the Fischer Lexikon
(1959)
The Mandan White
Indians
"What Columbus wanted to find was people who
were fully clothed, preferably in rich silks (as Marco Polo had described the
Japanese). So it was very exciting when one of his men who had gone a short
distance into the jungle stumbled upon a troop of thirty Indians among whom
were three men in tunics, one with a tunic right down to his feet which made
the Spaniards think he was a Christian friar, all the more so since they were
'as white as us'. The Spaniard was in fact so alarmed that he turned and fled,
but the man in the long tunic tried to catch up with him. Columbus finally
decided that this man must have been the local cacique (chief). But the admiral
was becoming tired and ill, and, aware that he could easily become stuck
without provisions, he turned back to Hispaniola."
The concept of
light-skinned Indians may seem like an anomaly, but it is not so rare as one
might believe. Within academic circles the pre-Spanish inhabitants of the
Caribbean islands are generally classified as Native Americans, but they also
fall under the category of "Atlantic Islanders", along with the
light-skinned Guanche Indians of the Canary archepelago. There are even
linguistic ties such as the use of the root word "Guan",
used all over the Canaries in Guanche place names, and in the Caribbean on the
first island Columbus landed on in the Bahamas, "Guanahani,"
as well as Cuban place names like Guantanamo
and Guanabacoa.
Besides Columbus,
Cortez found white Indians imprisoned in Montezuma's palace in Mexico City,
George Vancouver saw them on Vancouver Island in 1792, and commander Stiles of
the American Navy claimed to have seen the same group in 1848. Humboldt saw
about 100 of them in Columbia in 1801. White Indians have been reported among
the Mandan tribe along the banks of the Mississippi River, and in one of the
first books ever published by a Native American woman, "To The American Indian; Reminiscences of a Yurok Woman"
by Lucy Thompson (1916), she devoted an entire chapter of her work
titled: "Traditions of the Ancient
White People," where she gives vivid descriptions of the indigenous
Caucasian tribe called "Wa-gas,"
who had inhabited the northwest region of California prior to her Yurok people.
She describes the Wa-gas as moral and civilized, and says that they taught her
people all of their arts and sciences, including the fish traps still in use in
the 20th century, and says these Wa-gas were all over the continent. These same
early white indigenous tribes were also described by another native American
woman named Sarah Winnemucca Hopkins in her 1883 book titled "Life Among The Piutes; Their Wrongs and
Claims," who said that her tribe wiped out an entire tribe of 2600
reddish-haired people who lived along the Humboldt River, and this war lasted 3
years, finally trapping the last of them in a cave and burning them out with a
large fire.
Blonde Hair, blue
eyed Mandan Indian women with European features. The Mandan Indians were
in the distant past part of the Hopewell Moundbuilders in the Ohio Valley.
Their European features were the result of genetic mixing with the Adena
who had their origins in the British Isles via the Levant and were of Indo
European origin.
Another explorer who
believed that the Mandan had European roots, perhaps even Welsh, was the
frontiersman and pictorial historian George Catlin, who spent several months
with the tribe in North Dakota, living amongst and drawing and painting them in
1832. One of the things that first struck him about these mysterious people was
just how European they looked, describing that many of them were nearly white
and had light hair and blue eyes, and he also noticed that they had more
advanced techniques for manufacturing goods and dwellings, customs, traditions,
town layouts, and language vastly different from neighboring tribes. Caitlin
would say of the Mandan:
Even some of the
legends of the Mandan people themselves expressly mentioned that they had been
descended from a strange white man who had appeared to them aboard a canoe in
ancient times after an enormous flood had wiped out everything in sight. ( Genesis 6:17 KJV
And,
behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all
flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that
is in the earth shall die. )
They claimed that this stranger had taught
them about medicine and had influenced their religion, which oddly featured
many of the same beats as Christianity, such as a great flood, a virgin birth,
and a child born who could work magical miracles, among others. This was
noticed by other later expeditions as well, such as an 1833-34 expedition led
by German naturalist A.P. Maximilian, who felt that the similarities between
Christianity and the Mandan religion were too close to be mere coincidence.
Caitlin would write of this:
It would seem that
these people must have had some proximity to some part of the civilized world;
or that missionaries or others have been formerly among them, inculcating the
Christian religion and the Mosaic account of the Flood.
George Catlin
painting of a white Native American woman in traditional dress, near the
Missouri River. Mi-neek-e-sunk-te-ca (The Mink, George Catlin, 1832-1839) While
it could be argued that she was a descendant of captive European settlers,
Catlin had dozens of other paintings of Indians that looked nothing like this
one.
An ancient Mayan
wall-painting in the temple at Chitzen-Itza, first published by Morris, Charlot
and Morris in 1931, Vol. II, plate 146, who released this color reproduction of
these pre-Columbian murals, and wrote in the caption that they 'depict a series
of relating episodes concerning a fair-skinned people with flowing yellow hair,
defeated in battle and subsequently sacrificed by conventionally equipped
black-skinned warriors.' The priests or artists who decorated this important
Maya temple long before the arrival of Columbus, were obviously well acquainted
with the fact that there existed people with race traits different from their
own. Further, Morris, Charlot and Morris note: 'Just what this unusual
disparity of type may mean is purely a matter of conjecture, but it can not
help but bring to mind legends rife throughout the American continent
concerning the fair skin and golden hair of a mythical race.' From <http://whiteindians.com/politics.html>
One must ask
ourselves why there is so much confusion of the European People across the
continents? It is actually done by
ignorance and deliberate deception. The People of God were scattered to become
many Nations as the Heirs to the Promise
of Abraham.
Genesis
12:1-2
- Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee:
- And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:
Genesis 12:11-14
- And it came to pass, when he was come near to enter into Egypt, that he said unto Sarai his wife, Behold now, I know that thou art a fair woman to look upon:
- Therefore it shall come to pass, when the Egyptians shall see thee, that they shall say, This is his wife: and they will kill me, but they will save thee alive.
- Say, I pray thee, thou art my sister: that it may be well with me for thy sake; and my soul shall live because of thee.
- And it came to pass, that, when Abram was come into Egypt, the Egyptians beheld the woman that she was very fair.
Genesis 17:1-7 KJV
- And when Abram was ninety years old and nine, the LORD appeared to Abram, and said unto him, I am the Almighty God; walk before me, and be thou perfect.
- And I will make my covenant between me and thee, and will multiply thee exceedingly.
- And Abram fell on his face: and God talked with him, saying,
- As for me, behold, my covenant is with thee, and thou shalt be a father of many Nations.
- Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraham; for a father of many Nations have I made thee.
- And I will make thee exceeding fruitful, and I will make Nations of thee, and kings shall come out of thee.
- And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee.
Genesis 26:2-7 KJV
- And the LORD appeared unto him, and said, Go not down into Egypt; dwell in the land which I shall tell thee of:
- Sojourn in this land, and I will be with thee, and will bless thee; for unto thee, and unto thy seed, I will give all these countries, and I will perform the oath which I sware unto Abraham thy father;
- And I will make thy seed to multiply as the stars of heaven, and will give unto thy seed all these countries; and in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed;
- Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.
- And Isaac dwelt in Gerar:
- And the men of the place asked him of his wife; and he said, She is my sister: for he feared to say, She is my wife; lest, said he, the men of the place should kill me for Rebekah; because she was fair to look upon.
Context of FAIR:
|
3.
|
GOD SCATTERED THE ISRAELITE PEOPLE
Deuteronomy 32:
26 KJV
- I said, I would scatter them into corners, I would make the remembrance of them to cease from among men:
Deuteronomy 28:64
- And the LORD shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other; and there thou shalt serve other gods, which neither thou nor thy fathers have known, even wood and stone.
I HAVE LIMITED THIS RESEARCH ON THE ORIENTAL AND
ETHIOPIAN PEOPLE AS MY FOCUS IS ON THE ISRAELITE NATIONS. WHO THEY ARE AND
WHERE THEY ARE. THE ISRAELITES OF JACOB WHO GOD CALLED ISRAEL. ISRAEL IS A
BLOODLINE AND IS NOT A NATION CREATED IN 1948
Oriental People
Mizrahi Jews, Hebrew plural Bene Ha-Mizraḥ (“Sons of the East”), also
called Oriental Jews, the approximately
1.5 million Diaspora
Jews who lived for
several centuries in North
Africa and the Middle
East and whose ancestors did not reside in either Germany or Spain. They
are thus distinguished from the two other major groups of Diaspora
Jews—the Ashkenazim
(German rite) and the Sephardim
(Spanish rite).
In the Arab lands of Morocco,
Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Yemen, Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq, and Syria,
Mizrahi Jews speak Arabic
as their native tongue. In Iran, Afghanistan, and Bukhara (Uzbekistan) they
speak Farsi (Persian),
whereas in Kurdistan (a region including parts of modern Turkey, Iraq, Iran,
Syria, and Armenia) their language is a variant of ancient Aramaic.
Some Mizrahi Jews
migrated to India, other parts of Central Asia, and
China. In some Mizrahi Jewish communities
(notably those of Yemen and Iran), polygyny has been
practiced. Following the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, practically
all the Yemenite, Iraqi, and Libyan Jews and major parts of the other Mizrahi
Jewish communities migrated to Israel.
Ethiopian People'
Judaism has long been
practiced in the vicinity of the ancient city of Gonder. Most of the
Ethiopian Jews—who call themselves Beta Israel but also have been known as Falasha—have relocated to Israel (see Researcher’s Note: Falasha migration to
Israel, 1980–92).
The Danger Of The Communist Talmudic Zionist
Infiltration Of Christianity- The Holy Catholic Church
Is a Massive Apostasy from Catholicism Even Possible?
We know that the
Catholic Church will endure until the end of time: “I am with you all days, even unto the consummation of the world.” (Matthew,
28:20) Nevertheless, the misconception that the Church will always have a large
number of faithful Catholics, is not claimed in Sacred Scripture nor anywhere
else. Quite to the contrary, Scripture tells us: “…
yet the Son of man, when He cometh, shall He find, think you, faith on earth?”
(Luke 18:8).
History has
witnessed time and again entire nations (England) and even groups of nations
(the Great Eastern Schism), who were once Catholic, apostatizing from the
Faith. That this would happen on a larger scale, especially in consideration of
a “shrinking world” due to modern technology, is not at all inconceivable, and
in fact, was predicted and has happened.
This was
accomplished, in part, because the enemies of the Church had become
historically astute, and cognizant of the fact that external persecution of the
Church actually brings about Her greater growth, as the saying goes: “The blood
of the martyrs is the seed of the Faith.” That is why for centuries they have
been focusing their efforts on destroying Catholicism by infiltration.
Pope St. Pius X
warned the Church of this in 1907:
“[T]hey put into operation their designs for Her [the
Church’s] undoing, not from without but from within. Hence, the danger is
present almost in the very veins and heart of the Church, whose injury is the
more certain from the very fact that their knowledge of Her is more intimate.
Moreover, they lay the ax not to the branches and shoots, but to the very root,
that is, to the faith and its deepest fibers.” – Pascendi Dominici
Gregis
Pope St. Pius X was
not revealing anything new; rather He was adding His own warning to that of
many other Popes and to the numerous warnings Heaven had been sending for
hundreds of years.
POPE FRANCIS
St. Hippolytus (3rd century)
"And the churches too will wail with a mighty
lamentation, because neither oblation nor incense is attended to, nor a service
acceptable to God; but the sanctuaries of the churches will become like a
garden-watcher's hut, and the Holy Body and Blood of Christ will not be shown
in those days. The public service of God shall be extinguished.”
St. Nicholas von Flue (15th century)
“The Church will be punished because the majority of
Her members, high and low, will become so perverted. The Church will sink
deeper and deeper until She will at last seem to be extinguished, and the
succession of Peter and the other Apostles to have expired. But, after this,
She will be victoriously exalted in the sight of all doubters.”
St. John Bosco (19th century)
“There will be an Ecumenical Council in the next
century, after which there will be chaos in the Church.” [1862 Prediction]
PREDICTIONS FROM THE POPES
Pope Leo XIII
St. John Bosco (19th century)
On September 25,
1886, Pope Leo XIII was favored with a vision of the legions of Hell and their
efforts in destroying the Catholic Church. The vision so frightened Him that it
caused Him to lose consciousness. In response to this vision, He composed a prayer
to St. Michael the Archangel and commanded that this prayer be said every day
after the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. A relevant part of that prayer is here
presented, as it was found in the foremost book of indulgenced prayers of the
Catholic Church (the Raccolta) in 1930: (It is noteworthy that later editions
of the Raccolta have extracted this portion of Leo XIII’s prayer).
“These most crafty enemies [the devils] have filled
and inebriated with gall and bitterness the Church, the spouse of the
Immaculate Lamb, and have laid impious hands on Her most sacred possessions. In
the Holy Place itself, where has been set up the See of the most holy Peter and
the Chair of Truth for the light of the world, they have raised the throne of
their abominable impiety, with the iniquitous design that when the Pastor has
been struck, the sheep may be scattered.”
Pope St. Pius X
the beginning of those evils which are reserved for
the last days.
Pope Pius XII
“We believe that the present hour is a dread phase of
the events told by Christ. It seems that darkness is about to fall on the
world. Humanity is in the grip of a supreme crisis.”
“Mankind must prepare itself for sufferings such as
it has never before experienced.” This comment comes from the Pope who lived
through World War I and World War II! He expressed dismay at what he saw facing
humanity in the not so distant future, describing those times as “the darkest
since the deluge.”
“I am worried by the Blessed Virgin’s messages to
Lucy of Fatima. This persistence of Mary about the dangers which menace the
Church is a Divine warning against the suicide of altering the Faith, in Her
liturgy, Her theology and Her soul. … I hear all around me innovators who wish
to dismantle the Sacred Chapel, destroy the universal flame of the true Faith
of the Church, reject Her ornaments and make Her feel remorse for Her
historical past.”
“A day will come when the civilized world will deny
its God, when the Church will doubt as Peter doubted. She will be tempted to
believe that man has become God. In our churches, Christians will search in
vain for the red lamp where God awaits them. Like Mary Magdalene, weeping
before the empty tomb, they will ask, ‘Where have they taken Him?’”
The red lamp burning
in Catholic Churches signifies that God is really present before them in the
Most Blessed Eucharist – Pope Pius XII is here prophesying that the Most
Blessed Sacrament will no longer be able to be found in the ‘Catholic’
churches, a reality which took place shortly after his death as a result of
Vatican Council II.
Let us Pray:
Mary, Immaculate
Queen of the Universe, Spouse of the Holy Ghost, Mediatrix of All Graces,
triumph and reign, in the Name of Jesus and for the love of Jesus, now and
forever. Amen.
Beloved Mother Mary,
Our Lady of Good Success, I give myself completely to thy Immaculate Heart.
Please replace my poor and sinful heart with thy Pure and Immaculate Heart, now
and forever. Amen.
In 1972, Pope Paul
VI made an extraordinary remark that drew worldwide attention. He said that the
“smoke of Satan has entered the sanctuary of God”, meaning the Catholic church.
I can’t help wonder whether, in uttering these words, he was making a regretful
admission of guilt on his own part. Because it was under his auspices, in 1965,
that the church issued a document called Nostra Aetate, which reversed most of
the church’s key and time-honoured teachings on Jews. Overnight, the virile antisemitism of the old
Catholic doctrine was replaced by a weak and neutered philosemitism. The
Catholic church, one of the Jews’ traditional adversaries, had been taken out
of the game. And it happened through infiltration.
AGAIN THE WORD JEW IS A MISNOMER AND IS USED MOST
OFTEN IN IGNORANCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICLE THE WRITER'S ERROR IS LEFT
INTACT AS IT IS A WORD THAT IS COMMON IN THE AMERICAN VOCABULARY BUT IS
INCORRECT AS THERE IS AND NEVER HAS BEEN A PERSON KNOWN AS A JEW. MOST LIKELY
THE REFERENCES ARE TO THE ASHKENAZI PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT JEWS.
BEGIN CITATION
…the church had
never in its history looked upon the Jews in the ways specified in Nostra
Aetate. A second pioneer in the Christian-Jewish dialogue, the American Paulist
Father Thomas Stransky of Milwaukee, who helped draft Nostra Aetate as an
advisor at Vatican II, makes the point more radically. The Declaration signaled
a “180 degree turnabout,” he said in a speech of 2006, reversing all that the
church had thought about Jews since its early days, a time when teachings about
Christ’s divinity or the Trinity had yet to be formulated. From the third
century at the latest, church authorities taught that the Jews’ destiny was to
wander the earth suffering retribution from God for rejecting Christ,
(
Matthew 27:22-28
22Pilate saith unto them, What shall I
do then with Jesus which is called Christ? They
all say unto him, Let him be crucified. 23And the governor said, Why, what evil
hath he done? But they cried out the more, saying, Let him be crucified. 24When Pilate saw that he could prevail
nothing, but that rather a tumult was
made, he took water, and washed his
hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just
person: see ye to it. 25Then
answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on
our children. 26Then released he Barabbas unto them:
and when he had scourged Jesus, he delivered him
to be crucified. 27Then the soldiers of the governor
took Jesus into the common hall, and gathered unto him the whole band of soldiers. 28And they stripped him, and put on him
a scarlet robe. )
serving in their
destitution as the most direct evidence that the church’s claims to God’s favor
were correct. By acts of discrimination passed by councils through the
centuries, the church then created conditions calculated to keep the Jews
destitute. This situation was supposed to endure until the end of time when the
Jews finally turned to Christ.
The teaching of
Vatican II could not have been more different. Beyond saying that the promises—
thus the Covenant— made by God with the Jews were still in force, the document
asserted— quoting St. Paul’s letter to the Romans— that the Jews remained “most
dear” to God. That is, they continued to enjoy God’s favor. This radical shift
in teaching worried many, including Father Stransky, who wondered whether
Catholics could suddenly assimilate ideas that contradicted everything they had
been taught to believe. Yet in 1965, despite
insistent urging from the personal theologian of Pope Paul VI, the drafters of
Nostra Aetate refused to say that the church must conduct a mission to the
Jews, or that the Jews must turn to Christ.
In the statement
that the bishops overwhelmingly accepted and Paul VI promulgated as
authoritative church teaching— teaching that cannot be rescinded by later
popes— the drafters likewise ignored other sections of scripture suggesting
that Jews were responsible for Christ’s death
(Acts 3: 15 And killed the Prince of life,
whom God hath raised from the dead; whereof
we are
witnesses. KJV )
and lived under a
curse and that the covenant God had made with the Jews was obsolete
( Heb.
8: 13 In that he saith, A new covenant,
he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away. KJV )
Instead, they
shifted the church’s understanding of its relation to the Jews to three
chapters of Paul’s letter to the Romans, which contain the Apostle’s most
mature reflections on the Jewish people.
The pages that
follow trace the Declaration’s origin from the intellectual milieu out of which
this shift to Paul occurred, namely, groups of Catholic anti-Nazis
operating in Central Europe in the 1930s. Among them was one of Nostra Aetate’s
authors, the priest Johannes M. Oesterreicher, originally
an Ashkenazi from Moravia, who served as theological consultant at the Vatican
Council, but began his struggle against antisemitism in Vienna in 1933.
One fact stands out in their histories: they were
converts. This trend did not begin in 1933. From the 1840s until 1965,
virtually every activist and thinker who worked for Catholic-Jewish
reconciliation was not originally Catholic. Most were born Jewish. Without
converts the Catholic Church would not have found a new language to speak to
the Jews after the Holocaust.
As such, the story
of Nostra Aetate is an object lesson on the sources but also the limits of
solidarity. Christians are called upon to love all humans regardless of
national or ethnic background, but when it came to the Jews, it was the
Christians whose family members were Jews who keenly felt the contempt
contained in traditional Catholic teaching.
The Second Vatican
Council was the take-down of the Catholic Church by the Jews. More than a
millennium worth of teaching, and knowledge distilled from hard experience, was
jettisoned without justification. Jews were declared innocent of the crime of
killing Christ, thus repudiating the Gospel of Matthew (“His blood be upon us
and our children!”). Antisemitism was decried. Active efforts to convert Jews
were abandoned. And the doors were thrown open to the dilute, interfaith
utopianism we see prevailing to this day (“Religions are all the same! They
just call God by different names!”).
As I discussed in
Part 1 of this series (link),
this victory was achieved partly through infiltration of the Catholic Church by
Jews “converting” to Catholicism (not a few of whom “converted” back to Judaism
afterwards) then working to undermine it from within, and partly through
successfully applied sophistry, a Jewish specialty.
But while the
Council was in session, an extraordinary last-minute effort was made to avert
this final capitulation of the Catholic Church before Jewry.
Even
while the Council was sitting there appeared a book of more than 600 pages, not
obtainable through normal channels but distributed among the council fathers,
with the title Complotto contro la Chiesa (Rome 1962), written by a certain
‘Maurice Pinay’ In an extreme and the book reflects what at the time of the
Council was printed in some Italian newspapers; that the Council was a clever
manoeuvre to push through the reluctant apertura a sinistra (the Italian idea
of a break through). One passage is enough to illustrate this: . . . a
veritable fifth column of agents controlled by Freemasons, communism and the
secret powers that command them; some of these agents were even to be found
among those cardinals, archbishops and bishops who form a kind of progressive
wing within the Council and who are trying to get the various reforms adopted .
. . and all this ostensibly in order to modernise the Church and to align her
with the times, but with the hidden intention of opening doors to communism, to
hasten the collapse of the free world and to prepare for the imminent
destruction of Christendom’.
Vatican II:
Impressions of a Struggle of Minds E. SCHILLEBEECKX Life of the Spirit
(1946-1964) Vol. 17, No. 202 (JUNE 1963), pp. 499-505
The “Plot
against the church” is one of the most fascinating works of antisemitism
ever. As well as covering contemporary topics such as Communism, it goes into
the deep history of the conflict between Christendom and Jewry, elaborated over
the centuries as a struggle between the Christian church and vicious Jewish
adversaries who foment heresies in order to weaken and confound it.
It was reported that
“America First” nationalist Gerald L. K. Smith was involved in trying to gain
an audience for the book.
…Msgr.
George Higgins, a columnist for the National Catholic Welfare Conference’s
press service reported angrily (St. Louis Review, July 30) that Gerald L. K.
Smith had written to all American bishops offering to supply them, free of
charge, with a copy of an English translation of a “sickening diatribe against
the Jews.”
This
long “pathologically antisemitic book/’ by a pseudonymous Maurice Pinay,
entitled II Complotto contra la la Chiesa (“The Plot Against the Church”), had
been distributed to all of the bishops during the second session of the Council
(AJYB, 1965 [Vol. 66], p. 112). Smith’s four-page letter, Msgr. Higgins
reported, suggested that the American bishops had been taken in by “a
fraternity of deceivers too close to the centers of authority in the affairs of
the church.”
Source: THE
CHURCH AND THE JEWS: THE STRUGGLE AT VATICAN COUNCIL II
by Judith Hershcopf,
The American Jewish Year Book, Vol. 67 (1966), pp. 45-77
Published by:
American Jewish Committee
But who was the
author? Maurice Pinay had never been heard from before and was never heard from
again. How was he able to produce a work that was clearly the product of
profound study, translate it into multiple languages, print thousands of copies
of it (all the bishops attending the council got one) and somehow distribute it
inside the Vatican during a secret conclave? The book was distributed in
Italian but there are reports and indications that it was originally written in
Spanish. Various sources claim it was written by a group rather than an
individual. Some reports
in Italian mention Joaquín Sáenz y Arriaga as one of the authors.
Montini aka Anti-Pope Paul VI
Two
former Communists, Bella Dodd and Manning Johnson, spoke on Communist
infiltration of the Catholic Church. Dodd, an important Communist party lawyer,
teacher and activist, converted to Catholicism in April 1952 under the tutelage
of Bishop Fulton J. Sheen. Stating that the Communist infiltration was so
extensive that in the future “you will not recognize the Catholic Church,” Dodd
also asserted that:
“In the 1930’s, we put eleven hundred men into the priesthood in
order to destroy the Church from within.”
“Right now they are in the highest
places, and they are working to bring about change in order that the Catholic
Church will no longer be effective against Communism.”
Manning
Johnson, a former Communist Party official and author of “Color, Communism and
Common Sense” testified in 1953 to the House un-American Activities Committee
regarding the infiltration of the Catholic Church:
“Once the tactic of infiltration
of religious organizations was set by the Kremlin … the Communists discovered
that the destruction of religion could proceed much faster through infiltration
of the (Catholic) Church by Communists operating within the Church itself. The
Communist leadership in the United States realized that the infiltration tactic
in this country would have to adapt itself to American conditions (Europe also
had its cells) and the religious make-up peculiar to this country. In the earliest
stages it was determined that with only small forces available to them, it
would be necessary to concentrate Communist agents in the seminaries. The
practical conclusion drawn by the Red leaders was that these institutions would
make it possible for a small Communist minority to influence the ideology of
future clergymen in the paths conducive to Communist purposes This policy of
infiltrating seminaries was successful beyond even our communist expectations.”
Comments
Post a Comment