The Danger Of The Zionist Infiltration of Christianity (Reformation)
The Danger Of The Zionist Infiltration of Christianity
(Reformation) -The Protestant movement
REFORMATION
MARTIN LUTHER
The Reformation is
usually dated to 31 October 1517 in Wittenberg, Saxony, when Luther sent his
Ninety-Five Theses on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences to the Archbishop
of Mainz. The theses debated and criticised the Church and the papacy, but
concentrated upon the selling of indulgences and doctrinal policies about
purgatory, particular judgment, and the authority of the pope. He would later
in the period 1517–1521 write works on the Catholic devotion to Virgin Mary,
the intercession of and devotion to the saints, the sacraments, mandatory
clerical celibacy, monasticism, further on the authority of the pope, the
ecclesiastical law, censure and excommunication, the role of secular rulers in
religious matters, the relationship between Christianity and the law, and good
works.[8]
Germany was home to
the greatest number of Protestant reformers
that developed the Reformation. Nearly each state that turned Protestant had
their own reformers responsible for the implementation of the renewed faith and
the foundation of churches. Martin Luther pioneered
these activities in Electoral
Saxony, where under his own supervision, the Evangelical-Lutheran
Church of Saxony was organized and served as an example for other states.
( This
spread to reformation outside of Germany throughout Europe )
( The
History of Religion into what is now Talmudic Zionism is a very detailed
project. I have inserted links for those that wish to study it. I can only give
a brief outline. Suffice to say the Reformation was a very brutal bloody time
of religious war that lasted 30 years in the history of Europe. There were many
individuals that were involved and Christian doctrine seemed to change with
every individual involved as The Holy Scriptures became more corrupted with
each new "doctrine" or
"traditions of men )
The
Reformation at its peak, superimposed on modern European borders
Religious
fragmentation in Central
Europe at the outbreak of the Thirty Years' War
(1618).
AMERICA PROTESTANTISM
The theological and
religious descendants of the Protestant Reformation arrived in the United
States in the early 17th century, shaped American culture in the 18th century,
grew dramatically in the 19th century, and continued to be the guardians of
American religious life in the 20th century.
The Danger of the Zionist Infiltration of
Christianity-Dispensationalism and The Scofield Bible
DISPENSATIONALISM
The difference between protestant and
dispensationalism
is that protestant is (christianity) a member of any of
several christian denominations which separated from the roman catholic church
based on theological or political differences during the reformation (or
sometimes later) while dispensationalism
is (religion) a protestant evangelical theology rooted in the writings of.
Dispensationalists
profess a definite distinction between Israel and the Church. For
dispensationalists, Israel is an ethnic nation[6] consisting of Hebrews (Israelites),
beginning with Abraham and
continuing in existence to the present. The Church, on the other hand, consists
of all saved individuals in this present dispensation—i.e., from the
"birth of the Church" in Acts until the time of the Rapture.[7] According to progressive
dispensationalism in contrast to the older forms, the distinction between
Israel and the Church is not mutually exclusive, as there is a recognized
overlap between the two.[8]:295
The overlap consists of Jewish
Christians such as Peter and Paul, who were ethnically Jewish and also had faith in
Jesus.[9]
Dispensationalists
believe that Israel as a nation will embrace Jesus as their messiah toward the end of the Great Tribulation,
right before the Second
Coming. Classical dispensationalists refer to the present-day Church as a
"parenthesis" or temporary interlude in the progress of Israel's
prophesied history.[10] Progressive dispensationalism
"softens" the Church/Israel distinction by seeing some Old Testament
promises as expanded by the New Testament to include the Church. However,
progressives never view this expansion as replacing promises to its original
audience, Israel.[11]
Dispensationalism
developed as a system from the teachings of John Nelson Darby
(1800–82) who strongly influenced the Plymouth Brethren of
the 1830s in Ireland and England. The original concept came when Darby
considered the implications of Isaiah 32 for Israel. He saw that prophecy
required a future fulfillment and realization of Israel's kingdom. The New
Testament church was seen as a separate program not related to that kingdom.
Thus arose a prophetic earthly kingdom program for Israel and a separate
"Mystery" heavenly program for the church.
Thus arose a
prophetic earthly kingdom program for Israel and a separate "Mystery"
heavenly program for the church. In order to not conflate the two programs, the
prophetic program had to be put on hold to allow for the church to come into
existence. Then it is necessary for the church to be raptured away before
prophecy can resume its earthly program for Israel.[22] Some critics have claimed that
there was no Christian teaching of a rapture before Darby began preaching about
it in the 1830s. ( The Rapture Doctrine is not
Scriptural and did not appear as a doctrine of any Christians Church until the
1830's. It I a corruption of this Scripture:
1 Thessalonians 4:17 - Then we which are
alive [and] remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet
the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
From
<https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Bible-Verses-About-Rapture/>
The
King James Scriptures are very clear speaking against this doctrine
Ezekiel :
13:17-21 KJV
17 Likewise, thou son of man, set thy
face against the daughters of thy people, which prophesy out of their own
heart; and prophesy thou against them,
18 And say, Thus saith the Lord God;
Woe to the women that sew pillows to all armholes, and make kerchiefs upon the
head of every stature to hunt souls! Will ye hunt the souls of my people, and
will ye save the souls alive that come unto you?
19 And will ye pollute me among my
people for handfuls of barley and for pieces of bread, to slay the souls that
should not die, and to save the souls alive that should not live, by your lying
to my people that hear your lies?
20 Wherefore thus saith the Lord God;
Behold, I am against your pillows, wherewith ye there hunt the souls to make
them fly, and I will tear them from your arms, and will let the souls go, even
the souls that ye hunt to make them fly.
21 Your kerchiefs also will I tear,
and deliver my people out of your hand, and they shall be no more in your hand
to be hunted; and ye shall know that I am the Lord. )
Start of the Church Age
Classic
dispensationalists such as C. I. Scofield[12][13] and Harry A. Ironside[14] followed by Revised
dispensationalists identify Pentecost
(Acts 2) with the start of the Church as distinct from Israel; this may be
referred to as the "Acts 2" position. Grace Movement
Dispensationalists believe that the church started later in Acts and
emphasize the beginning of the church with the ministry of Paul. Advocates of
this "mid-Acts" position identify the start of the church variously
from with the salvation of Saul in Acts 9[15] to the Holy Spirit's commissioning
of Paul in Acts 13. The "Acts 28" position[16] posits the beginning of the church
in Acts chapter 28 where the Apostle Paul quotes Isaiah 6:9-10 concerning the
blindness of Israel, announcing that the salvation of God is sent to the
Gentile world (Acts 28:28).
United States of America
John Nelson Darby is
considered by some to be the father of dispensationalism,[8]:10,
293 which was adopted, modified, and made popular in the United States
by the Scofield
Reference Bible. Charles Henry
Mackintosh (1820–96) popularized Darby more than any other Brethren author.
Scofield Reference Bible-Cyrus Scofield
The Scofield Reference Bible is a widely circulated
study Bible edited and
annotated by the American Bible student Cyrus I. Scofield,
which popularized dispensationalism
at the beginning of the 20th century. Published by Oxford University
Press and containing the entire text of the traditional, Protestant King James Version,
it first appeared in 1909 and was revised by the
author in 1917.[1]
The Scofield Bible
had several innovative features. Most important, it printed what amounted to a
commentary on the biblical text alongside the Bible instead of in a separate
volume, the first to do so since the Geneva Bible (1560).[2] It also contained a
cross-referencing system that tied together related verses of Scripture and
allowed a reader to follow biblical themes from one chapter and book to another
(so called "chain references"). Finally, the 1917 edition also attempted
to date events of the Bible. It was in the pages of the Scofield Reference
Bible that many Christians first encountered Archbishop James Ussher's
calculation of the date
of Creation as 4004 BC; and through discussion of Scofield's notes, which
advocated the "gap
theory," fundamentalists
began a serious internal debate about the nature and chronology of creation.[3]
The Scofield Bible
was published only a few years before World War I, a war that
destroyed the cultural optimism that had viewed the world as entering a new era
of peace and prosperity; then the post-World War II era
witnessed the creation in Israel
of a homeland for the Jews.
Thus, Scofield's premillennialism
seemed prophetic. "At the popular level, especially, many people came to
regard the dispensationalist scheme as completely vindicated."[4] Sales of the Reference Bible
exceeded two million copies by the end of World War II.[5] The Scofield Reference Bible
promoted dispensationalism,
the belief that between creation and the final judgment there
would be seven distinct eras of God's dealing with man and that these eras are
a framework for synthesizing the message of the Bible.[6] It was largely through the
influence of Scofield's notes that dispensationalism grew in influence among fundamentalist
Christians in the United States. Scofield's notes on the Book of Revelation
are a major source for the various timetables, judgments, and plagues
elaborated on by popular religious writers such as Hal Lindsey, Edgar C. Whisenant,
and Tim LaHaye;[7] and in part because of the success
of the Scofield Reference Bible, twentieth-century American fundamentalists
placed greater stress on eschatological
speculation. Opponents of biblical fundamentalism have criticized the Scofield
Bible for its air of total authority in biblical interpretation, for what they
consider its glossing over of biblical contradictions, and for its focus on
eschatology.[8]
WHO WAS CYRUS SCOFIELD?
Cyrus
Scofield had several incidents of a downright dishonest nature after he
supposedly became saved. The fact that in 1892 he began calling himself Doctor
Scofield without producing any Doctorate degree from any Seminary or University
is the least of his devious activities. Even the details he gave in his story
of conversion are proven to be fabricated, including the time, place and other
particularities, thereby placing doubt on the whole story.[iv]
He was a
self-promoter in every sense of the word, even lying about being able to
comfort and calm the entire city of Belfast, Ireland with a sermon he delivered
there the Sunday after the Titanic sunk.[v] His behind-the-scenes handlers saw to it that
his swindles and schemes were swept under the rug and that only a positive
image of him was promoted, especially an exaggeration of his Biblical knowledge
and wisdom. Men like 33rd degree
freemason George Bannerman Dealey owner of the Dallas
Morning News and member of Scofield’s church contributed greatly to the
cause .
One of
Cyrus’s first suspicious moves involved in producing his Reference Bible was to
take an unnecessary trip to the British Isles for research. He immediately
sought out the controversial scholars Westcott and Hort in London. These two
polecats guided him in how to alter the King James Bible so that it would be
compatible with the dispensationalist teachings he was recruited to promote.
Scofield preferred the Revised Version of the Bible, which was largely the
product of his mentors Westcott and Hort and was based on corrupted manuscripts
born in Alexandria, Egypt and espoused by the Vatican. (There is much
information available concerning the Occultic beliefs and activities of
Westcott and Hort).
Scofield’s
work continues to be praised and utilized today by men with questionable
motives. His closely guarded reputation remains intact
In all honesty, I consider the above
information about Cyrus Ingerson Scofield trivial in comparison to the
tampering he did with the word of God.
Links that may interest anyone wanting
to know more about the Corrupted Brand of Christianity practiced in America
today https://libertytothecaptives.net/darby_version_corrupt_methodically.html
THE TRUTH ABOUT THE SCOFIELD REFERENCE BIBLE
World Zionist
leaders initiated a program to change America and its religious orientation.
One of the tools used to accomplish this goal was an obscure and malleable
Civil War veteran named Cyrus I. Schofield. A much larger tool was a venerable,
world respected European book publisher–The Oxford University Press.
The scheme was to
alter the Christian view of Zionism by creating and promoting a pro-Zionist
subculture within Christianity. Scofield’s role was to re-write the King James
Version of the Bible by inserting Zionist-friendly notes in the margins,
between verses and chapters, and on the bottoms of the pages. The Oxford
University Press used Scofield, a pastor by then, as the Editor, probably
because it needed such as man for a front. The revised bible was called the
Scofield Reference Bible, and with limitless advertising and promotion, it
became a best-selling “bible” in America and has remained so for 90 years.
The Oxford
University Press owned “The Scofield Reference Bible” from the beginning, as
indicated by its copyright, and Scofield stated he received handsome royalties
from Oxford. Oxford’s advertisers and promoters succeeded in making Scofield’s
bible, with its Christian Zionist footnotes, a standard for interpreting
scripture in Judeo-Christian churches, seminaries, and Bible study groups. It
has been published in at least four editions since its introduction in 1908 and
remains one of the largest selling Bibles ever.
Among more
traditional churches that encourage, and in some cases recommend, the use of
the Scofield Reference Bible is the huge Southern Baptist Convention of
America, whose capture is World Zionism’s crowning achievement.
The Danger Of The Zionist Infiltration of Christianity
-The Ashkenazi Role
Christian Zionism
can be defined as Christian
support for the Zionist
cause — the return of the Jewish people to its biblical
homeland in Israel
Christian support
for Israel is not a recent development. Its politcal roots reach as far back to
the 1880s, when a man named William Hechler formed a committee of Christian
Zionists to help move Russian
Jewish refugees to Palestine after a series of pogroms. In 1884, Hechler wrote
a pamphlet called “The Restoration of Jews to Palestine According to the
Prophets.” A few years later, he befriended Theodor
Herzl after reading Herzl’s book The Jewish State, and joined Herzl to drum
up support for Zionism.
Hechler even arranged a meeting between Herzl and Kaiser Wilhelm II to discuss
Herzl’s proposal to establish a Jewish state in Palestine.
THE JEWISH PLAYERS
Rev. William Hechler
Theodor Herzl
Reverend
William H. Hechler - The Christian minister who legitimized Theodor Herzl
William Henry
Hechler was born, January 10, 1845, in the Hindu “Holy” city of Benares, India,
to a German Anglican missionary father, Dietrich Hechler, and his English wife,
Catherine Clive Palmer. William’s conservative education exposed him to
Evangelical Restorationism. A central belief of Restorationism was that the
“Second Coming of Jesus” would occur after the Jews were restored to Palestine.
Hechler’s faith did not mandate that the Jews had to convert before
Restoration. It did lead him to a sincere interest in the welfare of Jews,
Jewish concerns and in Palestine.
Theodor Herzl was
born in Budapest, then part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, in 1860. He grew up
in an assimilated Jewish household that had very little to do with Jewish life.
He was Jewish only to the extent that he was identified as a Jew by others. Moving
to Vienna, Herzl earned a Doctor of Law degree. He was never happy, nor
successful as a lawyer. Changing the direction of his life, he married the
daughter of a wealthy Jewish businessman, obtaining a very large dowry in the
process,
He approached the
Rothschilds. Herzl’s solution to the Jewish
Question was not assimilation but a national rebirth in a Jewish
national home. The solution to the Jewish
Question was political. His answer was an independent Jewish state.
Nordau was second
only to Herzl in the Zionist movement. Nordau gave Herzl key introductions to
British Jewish society and to the leading writer of British Jewry, Israel
Zangwill. Zangwill furthered Herzl on with introductions to Colonel Goldsmid,
the real life surrogate of George Eliot’s Daniel
Deronda, who was influential with the Maccabean Society in England. The
Maccabeans had been engaged in Zionist agricultural resettlement efforts of
Jews in Palestine for years.
Herzl understood
marketing. He understood he needed to get his message out; he needed to
publically shape political opinion. Herzl needed to reach the ears of power.
Landau headed the Die Welt, the Zionist
newspaper that Herzl founded
It is
not known for sure if Landau provided Herzl with the keys to the kingdom of
public relations legitimacy by introducing Rev. William Hechler to Herzl or
not. Landau certainly understood what the importance of a Christian’s
endorsement of Zionism could mean. As editor of Herzl’s Die Welt, Landau
published a full interview with Hechler in the second issue of the paper, June
11, 1897, Christians
about the Jewish Question. Hechler
introduced Zionist readers to Christian Restorationism.
First Zionist
Congress – Basel, August, 1897
Herzl’s and the
Zionist movement’s dramatic Congress took place in Basel. To emphasize the
theatric, all attendees were required to be attired in formal wear with top
hats. The Congress took on an air of international statesmanship. It was all
still an illusion without international legitimization. They needed to be
recognized by a great power of Europe
It was Hechler’s key
contacts to the Grand Duke, to Eulenburg that lead directly to the Kaiser. What
Herzl never did not understand, the honest motivations of faith, were not the
same as power politics of States. What motivated Hechler, the Grand Duke, perhaps
even Eulenburg, were not the same as the reasons von Bulow, Hohenlohe,
Marschall and the Kaiser wanted to help the Jews. Herzl proceeded to Palestine
as soon as possible arriving just one day ahead of the Kaiser.
October 27, 1898
One of the most
important results, if not the most important, of the Kaiser’s visit to
Palestine is the immense impetus it has given to Zionism, the movement for the
return of the Jews to Palestine. The gain to this cause is the greater since it
is immediate, but perhaps more important still is the wide political influence
which this Imperial action is like to have.
THE CHRISTION ZIONIST PLAYERS
An important
milestone in the history of Christian Zionism occurred in 1979, almost a
century after William Hechler approached Herzl
and offered to mobilize Christian support for a Jewish state: the founding of
the Moral Majority.
Founded by Rev.
Jerry Falwell, the Moral Majority was an organization made up of conservative
Christian political action committees that succeeded in mobilizing like-minded
individuals to register and vote for conservative candidates. With nearly six
million members, it became a powerful voting bloc during the 1980s and was
credited for giving Ronald
Reagan the winning edge in the 1980 elections. One of the Moral Majority’s
four founding principles was “support for Israel and Jewish people everywhere.”
In 1980, Falwell,
who ran a television ministry that reached millions of viewers, said of Israel:
“I firmly believe God
has blessed America because America has blessed the Jew. If this nation wants
her fields to remain white with grain, her scientific achievements to remain
notable, and her freedom to remain intact, America must continue to stand with
Israel.” Falwell disbanded the Moral Majority in 1989, but conservative
Christians have remained vocal supporters of Israel though they lacked a strong
formal structure for pro-Israel political action.
Christian Zionists,
through their volunteer work, political support, and financial assistance to
Israel and Jewish causes, have shown that they are stalwart friends of Israel.
They have donated large sums of money to support Israel, including to charities
that pay the costs of bringing Jews
from the former Soviet Union and Ethiopia
to Israel. For example, Pastor John Hagee has raised more than $4.7 million for
the United Jewish Communities. Pat Robertson’s Christian Broadcasting Network
has donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to help poor Jews across the world
move to Israel.
Pastor John Hagee, a
longtime supporter of Israel, based at the Cornerstone Church in San Antonio, Texas,
heads Christians United for Israel (CUFI), a pro-Israel group established in
2006. Hagee has denounced replacement theology, and says of Israel: “We believe
in the promise of Genesis
12:3 regarding the Jewish people and the nation of Israel. We believe that
this is an eternal covenant between God and the seed of Abraham
to which God is faithful.” Evangelical leader Pat Robertson echoed this
statement while on his tour of Israel during the Israel-Hizbullah
war, saying, “The Jews are God’s chosen people. Israel is a special nation
that has a special place in God’s heart. He will defend this nation. So
Evangelical Christians stand with Israel. That is one of the reasons I am
here.”
Pastor Hagee claims
that he and other Christian Zionists support Israel because they owe a debt of
gratitude to the Jewish people, and not because they want Jews to convert to
Christianity. The Jewish people gave the world Abraham,
Isaac,
and Jacob,
and the prophets,
of whom there were “not a Baptist in the bunch...The Jewish people do not need
Christianity to explain their existence. But Christians cannot explain our
existence without Judaism.
The roots of Christianity are Jewish.”
Dispensationalist
Christianity, an interpretive or narrative framework for understanding the
overall flow of the Bible,
teaches that Christianity did not replace Judaism,
but that it restored lost elements of it. The dispensationalist view of the Bible
is that the Old
Testament is foreshadowing for what will occur in the New
Testament and, at the end, Jesus
returns to reign on Earth after an epic battle between good and evil. Israel
plays a central role in the dispensationalist view of the end of the world. The
establishment
of Israel in 1948 was seen as a milestone to many dispensationalists on the
path toward Jesus’ return. In their minds, now that the Jews again had regained
their homeland, all Jews were able to return to Israel, just as had been
prophesied in the Bible. As described in the Book of
Revelation, there is an epic battle that will take place in Israel after it
is reestablished — Armaggedon
— in which it is prophesied that good will finally triumph over evil. However,
in the process, two-thirds of the Jews in Israel die and the other third are
converted to Christianity. Jesus then returns to Earth to rule for 1,000 years
as king.
The Danger Of The Zionist Infiltration of Christianity
-The Imposter People
Matthew 22:29 KJV
Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not know
the scriptures, nor the power of God
The Imposter People-The Ashkenazic People of Modern
Day Israel
Jewish historian, researcher and scholar Benjamin
Freedman writes:
When the word "Jew" was first introduced
into the English language in the 18th century its one and only implication,
inference and innuendo was "Judean." However during the 18th,
19th and 20th centuries a well-organized and well-financed international
"pressure group" created a so-called "secondary meaning"
for the word "Jew" among the English speaking peoples of the world. This
so-called "secondary meaning" for the word "Jew" bears no
relation whatsoever to the 18th century original connotation of the word
"Jew." It is a misrepresentation...
There is not a person in the whole English-speaking
world today who regards a "Jew" as a "Judean" in the
literal sense of the Word. That was the correct and only meaning of the word in the 18th century . . . (Facts Are Facts, by Benjamin H. Freedman, p.
15-21).
The meaning of the word "Jew" in our Bible
is not the same as the colloquial idiom.
In the
Bible the word "Jew" means a resident of the land of Judaea
regardless of their tribe, race or religion just as an Australian or Englishman
may in fact be a Chinese, Negro or an Eskimo, or perhaps a member of the tribe
of Judah (Judahite). According to the Greek Lexicon in Strong's Exhaustive Concordance:
Jew: Greek word #2453 Ioudaios (ee-oo-dah'-yos);
from #2448 (in the sense of #2455 as a country); Judaean, i.e. belonging to
Jehudah ["Judah" in Hebrew language of Old Testament]: KJV Jew
(-ess), of Judaea.
Greek word #2448 Iouda (ee-oo-dah'); of Hebrew
origin [Hebrew word #3063 or perhaps #3194]; Judah (i.e. Jehudah or Juttah), a
part of (or place in) Palestine: KJV Judah.
Greek word #2455 Ioudas (ee-oo-das'); of Hebrew
origin [Hebrew #3063]; Judas (i.e. Jehudah), the name of ten Israelites; also
of the posterity of one of them and its region: KJV Juda (-h, -s); Jude.
Genesis 49:10 prophesied, "The sceptre shall not
depart from Judah, nor
a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto Him shall the
gathering of the people be." ( MANY
MAY BE SURPRISED TO KNOW THAT JUDAH IS GERMANY AND TO THIS VERY DAY THE QUEEN
OF ENGLAND WHO IS ORIGINALLY OF GERMAN DESCENT HAS THE ROYAL SCEPTER OF THE
HOUSE OF JUDAH ) House of Windsor
Judah was
the largest and the most influential of the twelve tribes with the governing
right. Jacob prophesied it would maintain its pre-eminence until Shiloh, or
Messiah, came. He would then take headship and receive the allegiance of true
spiritual Israel as Isaiah 9:6-7 foretold. Matthew 1 and Luke 3 trace Jesus'
human lineage to David, Judah, Jacob and Abraham. Jesus took the sceptre from
Judah and we who receive Him as Messiah give Him our allegiance.
In the
days of His flesh few of the citizens of Judea were Judahites. Some belonged to
one of the other tribes of Israel, and many were descendants of Esau (Edomites) (These people are the Communist Soviet Union and are
modern day Russia. The majority being Ashkenazi people ) who had
assimilated and become co-religionists with the Judahites and remnants of the
other tribes in the hybrid religion of Pharisaism developed during the
captivity in Babylon. This is the religion of the Talmud is called Judaism
today; it was condemned by Jesus since it is the antithesis of the Mosaic Law
and the prophets and makes the Word of God of no effect (Matthew 15:1-9).
John 7:1, "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for
He would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill Him."
According
to Strong's Greek Lexicon, the English
word "Jewry" in this verse was translated from the Greek word #2449 Ioudaia {ee-oo-dah'-yah}
feminine for the land of Judea. Modern translations no longer use the word "Jewry" but the correct translation,
"Judea," as in the New
American Standard Bible: "And after these
things Jesus was walking in Galilee; for He was unwilling to walk in Judea, because the Jews were seeking to kill Him." The
New International Version uses the same word. However, these translations
continue to improperly use the word "Jews" in the same verse. A consistent translation would read: ". . . He was unwilling to walk
in Judea, because the Judeans were seeking to kill Him."
Today most
people think of Jews as the people of Israel, but that is not correct. An
Israelite was one who had descended from Jacob. In Jesus' time individual Jews
may or may not have descended from Jacob, but they all recognized Pharisaism
and not the
Law of Moses. A Jew is properly a Judean. ( JACOBS NAME WAS CHANGED TO ISRAEL AND THAT MEANS QUITE SIMPLY
THAT ISRAEL IS A BLOODLINE AND NOT A LAND MASS : Genesis 32:24-30 )
24 And Jacob was left alone; and there wrestled a man
with him until the breaking of the day.
25 And when he saw that he prevailed not against him, he
touched the hollow of his thigh; and the hollow of Jacob's thigh was out of
joint, as he wrestled with him.
26 And he said, Let me go, for the day breaketh. And he
said, I will not let thee go, except thou bless me.
27 And he said unto him, What is thy name? And he said,
Jacob.
28 And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob,
but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast
prevailed.
29 And Jacob asked him, and said, Tell me, I pray thee,
thy name. And he said, Wherefore is it that thou dost ask after my name? And he
blessed him there.
30 And Jacob called the name of the place Peniel: for I
have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved. )
The point
is that one who is called a "Jew" in the Bible is not necessarily a
chosen man of God, a follower of Moses and the prophets, a member of the tribe
of Judah, an Israelite, or even a Semite, but one who is a resident of Judea. A
Judean. But a well-organized and well-financed international "pressure
group" created a so-called "secondary meaning" for the new word
"Jew" which is not the understanding intended by the Scripture of
truth. Those who call themselves Jews today falsely imply they are somehow
descendants of the tribes of Israel and chosen of God. Yet few of them are Jews
as they are not "Judeans," or residents of Judea.
So if
modern day so-called Jews are not the Jews of the Bible, who are they? When
asked, "Who is Israel? - Who is a Jew?" the Israeli Government's
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) unhesitatingly answered:
"The
term Israelite is purely Biblical. An Israeli is a citizen of Israel, regardless of
religion. A Jew is a person anywhere in
the world born to a Jewish mother, or converted to Judaism, who is thus
identified as a member of the Jewish people and religion" (Information
Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Jerusalem; February, 1998).
The Jewish Almanac concurs: "Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to
call an ancient Israelite a "Jew." Or to call a contemporary Jew [an]
"Israelite," or a "Hebrew." The first Hebrews were not have
been Jews at all, and contemporary Palestinians, by their own definition of the
term "Palestinian," have to include Jews among their own people"
(The Jewish Almanac, October, 1980, page 3, Bantam Books, Inc).
Jerome
translated the Bible into Latin in the fourth century. John 19:19 refers to the
inscription Pilate posted over Jesus' cross. In our modern English Bibles we
read, "Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the
Jews," translated from the Greek "Ieous Nazoraios Basilius
Ioudaios" but the Latin Vulgate reads, "Iesus Nazerenus Rex
Iudaeorum." This is usually abbreviated INRI as on all statues and imagery
because there was no J.
In Samuel
Johnson's English Dictionary of 1755 and 1756 words beginning
with "I" and the new letter "J" are interspersed. There is
no listing for the word "Jew" in either his 1755 or 1756 editions
although "To Judaize"
is defined as "To conform to the manner of the Jews" in both.
The 1841 English Hexapla contains six
English translations of the New Testament arranged side by side for easy
comparison and reference. The six English translations are: The Wycliffe
version of 1380 (the first English Scripture, hand-copied prior
to Gutenberg's invention of the printing press in 1455), The Tyndale version of
1534-1536 (the first English printedScripture), and Cranmer's
Great Bible of 1539 (the first Authorized English Bible).
Continuing across each right-hand page is: The Geneva "1557"
translation actually completed in 1560, (the English Bible of the Protestant Reformation), The Rheims 1582 (the first Roman Catholic English version), and the 1611 King James First
Edition.
In the 1380 Wiclif Edition in English the Gospel by John
XIX.19, reads "ihesus of Nazareth kyng
of the iewes." Prior to the 14th century the English language adopted the
Anglo-Saxon "kyng" together with many other Anglo-Saxon words in
place of the Latin "rex" and the Greek "basileus." The
Anglo-Saxon also meant "tribal leader." ( The very
word Anglo-Saxon means Sons of Isaac who was the son of Abraham and heir to the
promises of God thru Abraham. They came across the Caucus Mountains and to this
very day are called Caucasians. ) http://www.israelite.info/research/sourcedocumentsfiles/anglosaxons.html
)
1729
Daniel Mace New Testament is the first Scripture to contain the word
"Jew", here
in Romans 2:13 - 3:21.
What is a Jew?
Speaking
to His elect Church Jesus said, "I know
your affliction and your poverty, but you have heavenly riches, and I know the blasphemy of them who say
they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan . . . Take note, I will make them of
the synagogue of Satan, who say they are Jews, but are impostors who lie, to come and worship before your feet, and to know
that I have loved you" (Revelation 2:9; 3:9).
Speaking
to the so-called Jews who were of the sect of the Pharisees (or Judaism) Jesus
said, "You serpents, offspring of vipers,
how can you escape being sentenced to hell fire? Therefore take notice, I will
send you prophets, and wise men, and scribes, some of whom you will kill and
crucify; and some of whom you will flog in your synagogues, and persecute from
town to town, that upon you may come all the righteous blood that has been shed
on the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zachariah the
son of Barachiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar. I assure
you, all these things shall come upon this race" (Matthew
23:33-36).
Jesus
identified these so-called Jews the Ashkenazic people as the descendants of
Cain.
( The descendants of Cain were called Kenites. They
came out of the House Of Rechab and were the Rechabites.
Rechabites /ˈriːkəbaɪts/ are a biblical clan, the descendants
of Rechab
through Jehonadab.
They belonged to the Kenites, who
accompanied the Israelites
into the Holy Land
and dwelt among them. The main body of the Kenites dwelt in cities and adopted
settled habits of life[1] but Jehonadab forbade his descendants to drink wine
or to live in cities.[2] They were commanded to always lead a nomadic
life.)
Strongs Concordance : (Horseman) [Rechab] born by the
ancestor of the house of the Rechabites who were bound by a vow ever to
preserve a nomadic life )
(MY NOTES : Genesis 4:12 “When thou tillest the
ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a
vagabond shalt thou be in the earth.” )
STRONGS CONCORDANCE: VAGABOND:
Strong's Concordance
alazón: vagabond, hence an impostor, boaster
Original Word: ἀλαζών, όνος, ὁ
Part of Speech: Noun, Masculine
Transliteration: alazón
Phonetic Spelling: (al-ad-zone')
Short Definition: a boaster
Definition: a boaster, one who gives one's self airs
in a loud and flaunting way.
NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
from alé (wandering)
Definition
vagabond, hence an impostor, boaster
Speaking
to Cain God said, "What have you done? the
voice of your brother's blood cries to Me from the ground. And now you are
cursed from the earth, which has opened her mouth to receive your brother's
blood from your hand" (Genesis 4:10-11).
Speaking
to Cain God said, "What have you done? the
voice of your brother's blood cries to Me from the ground. And now you are
cursed from the earth, which has opened her mouth to receive your brother's
blood from your hand" (Genesis 4:10-11).
Speaking
to Christ's end-time Bride regarding the Words of Jesus, the prophet William
Branham said, "Here is a verse that will bear considerable thought, not
only because it is most peculiar in its contents, but also it is virtually
repeated in an age that is over a thousand years later. . . To begin with, the
word, Jews, does not describe the
religion of the Jewish people. It refers only to the people of Judah and has
the same precise meaning if I were to say I am Irish born. These people were
saying that they were actually Jews, real Jews by birth. They were liars. They
were not Jews by birth and they weren't Jews by religion."
"The
group that inched its way ever so slowly into the church by its DEEDS
(Nicolaitanism) no longer fears exposure but is openly organized in a group of
its own assembling and is coming against the true Church in undisguised
hostility."
The Imposter People (Continued), and American Policy
Towards the Nation of Israel
STRONGS NT 3531: Νικολαΐτης
Νικολαΐτης, Νικολαιτου, ὁ, a follower of
Nicolaus, a Nicolaitan: plural, Revelation 2:6, 15 — a name which, it can scarcely be
doubted, refers symbolically to the same persons who in Revelation 2:14 are charged with holding τήν διδαχήν
Βαλαάμ, i. e. after the example of Balaam, casting a stumblingblock before the
church of God (Numbers 24:1-3) by upholding the liberty of eating
things sacrificed unto idols as well as of committing fornication; for the
Greek name Νικόλαος coincides with the Hebrew בִּלְעָם according to the
interpretation of the latter which regards it as signifying destruction of the
people. See in Βαλαάμ; (cf. BB. DD., under the words Nicolaitans, Nicolas; also
commentaries on Revelation, at the passages cited). https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Revelation-2-6/
New Lies for Old - Ashkenazic Jews
In Judaism 101
it is stated that:
Those secular
American Jews would probably be surprised to learn that much of what they think
of as Jewish culture is really just Ashkenazic Jewish culture,
the culture of Jews whose ancestors come from one part of the world.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete